问题 多项选择题

【真题试题】(2008年案例分析第71~74题)甲与朋友在酒店聚餐时不慎将其佩戴的一块价值5万元的“劳力士”牌手表丢失。 该表被酒店服务员拾得后交给了当地公安机关,公安机关遂发布了失物招领公告。由于在公告发布后六个月内无人认领,该公安机关即按照有关规定将该表交拍卖行进行拍卖,乙通过拍卖买下该手表。两年后,乙游泳时,将该表放于更衣室,被丙偷走。随后,丙将该表以500元的价格卖给了某朋友丁,但丁并不知该手表为丙盗窃所得。后来丙被公安机关抓获,在审讯中,丙供述了其盗窃上述手表并出售的事实。公安机关遂要求丁将该手表交出,并发布了认领公告。公告期内,甲、乙均前来认领。公安机关根据乙当时的报案记录、丙的供述等线索确定该手表的失主为乙,遂让乙将该表领走。但甲提出他是该手表的真正所有权人,并出示了购买发票。丁此时也提出该手表是自己花钱买来的,法律教|育网要求拥有该手表。甲、乙、丁三方为此争执不下,甲和丁均起诉至法院,要求确认各自对该手表的所有权。

【真题试题】(2008年案例分析第74题)对于乙从拍卖行购得该手表的行为,下列表述中正确的是(  )。

A.该行为属于买卖行为

B.该行为效力待定

C.该行为发生所有权转移

D.该行为属于合法行为

答案

参考答案:A,C,D

解析:【真题解析】本题主要考查拍卖行为的性质。由于拍卖行系受公安机关的委托依法拍卖该手表,故乙从该拍卖行购得手表的行为属于合法的买卖行为,乙因该手表的交付而取得所有权。所以选项ACD是正确答案。

阅读理解

阅读理解。

     We're all connected. You can send an e-mail message to a friend, and your friend can pass it on to

one of his or her friends, and that friend can do the same, continuing the chain. Eventually, your message

could reach just about anyone in the world, and it might take only five to seven e-mails for the message

to get there.

     Scientists recently tested that idea in a study involving 24,000 people. Participants had to try to get

a message forwarded to one of 18 randomly chosen people. Each participant started by sending one

e-mail to someone they knew. Recipients could then forward the e-mail once to someone they knew,

and so on.

     Targets, who were randomly assigned by researchers from Columbia University in New York, lived

in 13 countries. They included an Australian police officer, a Norwegian veterinarian, and a college

professor.

     Out of 24,000 chains, only 384 reached their goal. The rest petered out, usually because one of the

recipients was either too busy to forward the message or thought it was junk mail.

     The links that reached their goal made it in an average of 4.05 e-mails. Based on the lengths of the

failed chains, the researchers estimated that two strangers could generally make contact in five to seven

e-mails.

     The most successful chains relied on casual acquaintances rather than close friends. That's because

your close friends know each other whereas your acquaintances tend to know people you don't know.

The phenomenon, known as the strength of weak ties, explains why people tend to get jobs through

people they know casually but aren't that close to.

     So, start networking and instant messaging now. As they say in show business: It's all about who

you know.

1. If you want to get into touch with a stranger in the world, how many e-mails might it take for the

message to reach him/her?

A. 5 to 7

B. 18

C. 13

D. 384

2. Which of the following is Not true about the test?

A. 24,000 people took part in the study and sent e-mails to people they knew.

B. The 18 targets were chosen by chance.

C. About 98.4% of the mails didn't reach their goal because some people were too busy or they mistook

the message for junk mail.

D. The targets come from 13 countries, such as Australia, Norway and New York.

3. What does the word "estimate" mean in the passage?

A. make sure

B. suppose

C. think over

D. imagine

4. Why do people tend to get jobs more easily through casual acquaintances than close friends?

A. Because close friends don't talk with each other so much.

B. Because casual acquaintances can help you know more people and make more friends.

C. Because close friends don't spend so much time gathering together.

D. Because casual acquaintances are kinder and more willing to help others.

5. In which part of a newspaper will readers read this passage?

A. Culture

B. Entertainment

C. Information and Technology

D. Health

名词解释