问题 单项选择题

In almost all cases the soft parts of fossils are gone for ever but they were fitted around or within the hard parts. Many of them also were attached to the hard parts and usually such attachments are visible as depressed or elevated areas, ridges, or grooves, smooth or rough patches on the hard parts. The muscles most important for the activities of the animal and most evident in the appearance of the living animal are those attached to the hard parts and possible to reconstruct from their attachments. Much can be learned about a vanished brain from the inside of the skull in which it was lodged.
Restoration of the external appearance of an extinct animal has little or no scientific value. It does not even help in inferring what the activities of the living animal were, how fast it could run, what its food was, or such other conclusions as are important for the history of life. However, what most people want to know about extinct animals is what they looked like when they were alive. Scientists also would like to know. Things like fossil shells present no great problem as a rule, because the hard parts are external when the animal is alive and the outer appearance is actually preserved in the fossils.
Animals in which the skeleton is internal present great problems of restoration, and honest restorers admit that they often have to use considerable guessing. The general shape and contours of the body are fixed by the skeleton and by muscles attached to the skeleton, but surface features, which may give the animal its really characteristic look, are seldom restorable with any real probability of accuracy. The present often helps to interpret the past. An extinct animal presumably looked more or less like its living relatives, if it has any. This, however, may be quite equivocal. For example, extinct members of the horse family are usually restored to look somewhat like the most familiar living horses — domestic horses and their closest wild relatives. It is, however, possible and even probable that many extinct horses were striped like zebras. Others probably had patterns no longer present in any living members of the family. If lions and tigers were extinct they would be restored to look exactly alike. No living elephants have much hair and mammoths, which are extinct elephants, would doubtless be restored as hairless if we did not happen to know that they had thick, woolly coats. We know this only because mammoths are so recently extinct that prehistoric men drew pictures of them and that the hide and hair have actually been found in a few specimens. For older extinct animals we have no such clues.

The reconstruction of a fossilized animal’s external appearance is considered necessary in order to______.

A.(A) satisfy popular curiosity

B.(B) answer scientific questions

C.(C) establish its activities

D.(D) determine its eating habits

答案

参考答案:A

解析: 这是道细节题。根据文中第一段的“However, what most people want to know about extinct animals is what they looked like when they were alive. Scientists also would like to know.”但是大部分想知道那些动物活着的时候是什么样子的,科学家也想知道,故选A,为了满足大众的好奇心而要重建化石动物的外部面貌。

问答题

材料1
冰冷的江水中,10多名大学生手拉手搭成“人梯”,将两名落水少年拉向生的此岸,3名大学生却终被无情的江水卷走……2009年10月24日,在湖北省荆州市的长江边,上演了如此感人、如此惊心动魄的一幕。10月26日,荆州市授予在长江荆州宝塔河段救起两名落水少年的17名大学生和市民“舍己为人见义勇为英雄群体”。这17人当中包括14名长江大学的学生和3名沙市冬泳队的老人。2009年11月12日上午,10月24日长江救人英雄集体先进事迹首场报告会在湖北荆州市委礼堂举办,来自荆州市的机关干部、在校大学生、武警官兵、医护人员、普通市民等四百多名代表,聆听了英雄事迹报告。
材料2
10月24日,长江大学3名大学生何东旭、方招、陈及时为救两名落水少年,献出了宝贵的生命。令人心寒的是,在打捞英雄遗体时,面对同学们的“跪求”,个体打捞者不仅不为所动,而且挟尸要价,一共收取了3.6万元的捞尸费。11月7日,荆州市人民政府召开新闻发布会,向社会通报打捞3名大学生英雄遗体全过程。结果显示,10月24日在打捞3名大学生英雄遗体过程中,现场收取3.6万元费用的打捞公司业务负责人陈波,因额外向学校索要烟和矿泉水“构成了敲诈勒索”,公安机关已依法将其拘留15天,罚款1000元。
请回答:

运用自我价值和社会价值的关系原理分析长江大学学生救人事件。

判断题