问题 单项选择题


一、根据以下资料,回答101-105题。

根据全国第二次农业普查资料,2006年末,浙江实有耕地面积为1594.43千公顷,分别比 1980年、1985年、1990年、1996年、2000年减少12.5%、10.3%、7.5%、1.2%和0.8%,其中水田面积为1291.08干公顷,分别比1980年、1985年、1990年、1996年、2000年减少12.0%、10.5%、 9.7%、4.0%、2.8%。
随着第二、三产业发展,农民剩余劳动力转移,收入途径拓宽。与此同时,浙江农民人均土地逐年减少,农民经营农业规模不断缩小,收益相对下降,农民对农业经营投入下降。但多数农民身份没变,不敢完全放弃对承包到户土地的控制权,仍将土地看作家庭生存的保障之一,使浙江农业成为多数农户的副业,导致经营农业规模不断缩小、效益下降。2006年,浙江农村居民人均纯收人为7335元,从1996-2006年,各年份保持不同程度的增长,年平均实际增长6.8%; 2006年,浙江人均耕地面积为0.034公顷,比1980年下降28.2%;农民经营农业收入占人均纯收入的比重从1985年的37.3%下降到2006年的12.0%;农业生产户数为808.26万户,占农村住户数的66.2%,比2003年下降14.5个百分点;其中纯农户所占比重为19.5%,非农业兼业户达60.1%。
2006年,浙江牧业总产值为287.34亿元,占全省农、林、牧、渔业总产值的19.0%;1996-2006年年均增长为4.4%,比全省农、林、牧、渔业总产值年均增长高1.1个百分点;农民纯收人中,牧业的农民家庭经营收入为281元,占家庭经营收入的9.3%,1996-2006年的年均增长为 2.0%,分别比第二、三产业的经营收入的年增长率低8.8和8.0个百分点。
在先发优势不断减弱的情况下,农村的第二、三产业发展难度加大,农民经营非农产业的收入增长趋缓。浙江农民工资性收入与家庭经营非农产业收入在农民纯收人中占有较高比重。农村的第二、三产业发展是构成浙江农民上资性收入和家庭经营非农产业收入的主要来源。随着市场经济发展,要素资源不断匮乏,并向大企业倾斜,非农产业的创业成本不断提高,与农民收入关系紧密的农村第二、三产业发展趋缓,导致农民工资性收入和家庭经营非农产业收入增长趋缓。从浙江个体工业单位发展情况看,2007年单位数为67.5万户,2001-2007年年均增长 2.8%。

1996-2006年,浙江全省农、林、牧、渔业年均增长与农民第三产业经营收入的年增长率相比( )。

A.快了34%

B.慢了43%

C.快了76%

D.慢了67%

答案

参考答案:D

解析: 1996-2006年,浙江牧业年均增长为4.4%,比全省农、林、牧、渔业总产值年均增长高1.1个百分点,所以全省农、林、牧、渔业年均增长4.4%-1.1%=3.3%。1996-2006年牧业的农民家庭经营收入的年均增长为2.0%,比第三产业经营收入的年增长率低8.0个百分点,所以农民第三产业经营收入的年增长率是2.0%+8.0%=10.0%。所以前者比后者增速慢了(10.0-3.3)÷10.0×100%=67%。

填空题
单项选择题

If phone calls and web pages can be beamed through the air to portable devices, then why not electrical power, too It is a question many consumers and device manufacturers have been asking themselves for some time. But to seasoned observers of the electronics industry, the promise of wireless recharging sounds depressingly familiar. In 2004 Splashpower, a British technology firm, was citing “very p” interest from consumer-electronics firms for its wireless charging pad. Based on the principle of electromagnetic induction (EMI) that Faraday had discovered in the 19th century, the company’s “Splashpad” contained a coil that generated a magnetic field when a current flowed through it. When a mobile device containing a corresponding coil was brought near the pad, the process was reversed as the magnetic field generated a current in the second coil, charging the device’ s battery without the use of wires. Unfortunately, although Faraday’s principles of electromagnetic induction have stood the test of time, Splashpower has not — it was declared bankrupt last year without having launched a single product.

Thanks to its simplicity .and measurability, electromagnetic induction is still the technology of choice among many of the remaining companies in the wireless-charging arena. But, as Splashpower found, turning the theory into profitable practice is not straightforward. But lately there have been some promising developments.

The first is the formation in December 2008 of the Wireless Power Consortium, a body dedicated to establishing a common standard for inductive wireless charging, and thus promoting its adoption. The new consortium’s members include big consumer-electronics firms, such as Philips and Sanyo, as well as Texas Instruments, a chipmaker.

Fierce competition between manufacturers of mobile devices is also accelerating the introduction of wireless charging. The star of this year’s Consumer Electronics Show held in Las Vegas was the Pre, a smart-phone from Palm. The Pre has an optional charging pad, called the Touchstone, which uses electromagnetic induction to charge the device wirelessly.

As wireless-charging equipment based on electromagnetic induction heads towards the market, a number of alternative technologies are also being developed. PowerBeam, a start-up based in Silicon Valley, uses lasers to beam power from one place to another.

It now seems to be a matter of when, rather than if, wireless charging enters the mainstream. And if those in the field do find themselves languishing in the disillusionment, they could take some encouragement from Faraday himself. He observed that “nothing is too wonderful to be true if it be consistent with the laws of nature.” Not even a wirelessly rechargeable iPhone.

What’s the final goal of the Wireless Power Consortium()

A.To turn the Faraday’s theory into profitable practice

B.To find ways for the consumer-electronics industry

C. To integrate consumer-electronics firms and chipmakers

D. To promote a common standard for inductive wireless charging