问题 阅读理解

阅读理解。

     I hated dinner parties.But I decided to give them another shot because I'm in London.And

my friend Mallery invited me.And because dinner parties in London are very different from those

back in New York.There,"I'm having a dinner party" means:"I'm booking a table for 12 at a

restaurant you can't afford and we'll be sharing the cheque evenly,no matter what you eat."

Worse,in Manhattan there is always someone who leaves before the bill arrives.They'll throw

down cash,half of what they owe,and then people like me,who don't drink,end up paying even

more.But if I try to use the same trick,the hostess will shout:"Where are you going?" And it's

not like I can say I have somewhere to go:everyone knows I have nowhere to go.

     But in London,dinner parties are in people's homes.Not only that,the guests are an interesting

mix.The last time I went to one,the guests were from France,India,Denmark and Nigeria;it was

like a gathering at the United Nations in New York.The mix is lessstriking.It's like a gathering

at Bloomingdale's,a well known department store.

     For New Yorkers,talking about other parts of the world means Brooklyn and Queens in

New York.But at Mallery's,when I said that I had been to Myanmar recently,people knew

where it was.In New York people would think it was a usual new club.

1.What does the word "shot" in Paragraph 1 probably mean? _____

A.Choice

B.Try

C.Style

D.Goal

2.WhatdoesthewriterdislikemostaboutdinnerpartiesinNewYork? _____

AThereisastrangemixofpeople.

B.Therestaurantsareexpensive. 

C.Thebillisnotfairlyshared.

D.Peoplehavetopaycash

3.WhatdoestheauthorthinkofthepartiesinLondon? _____

A.Abitunusual.

B.Fulloftricks.

C.Lesscostly.

D.Moreinteresting.

4.Whatistheauthor'sopinionofsomeNewYorkersfromherexperience?_____

A.Easygoing.

B.Selfcentered.

C.Generous.

D.Conservative.

答案

1-4BCDB

默写题
单项选择题

Among various programmes, TV talk shows have covered every inch of space on daytime television. And anyone who watches them regularly knows that each one is different in style. But no two shows are more opposite in content, while at the same time standing out above the rest, than the Jerry Springer and the Oprah Winfrey shows.

Jerry Springer could easily be considered the king of" rubbish talk". The contents on his show are as surprising as can be. For example, the show takes the ever-common talk show titles of love, sex, cheating, and hate, to a different level. Clearly, the Jerry Springer show is about the dark side of society, yet people are willing to eat up the troubles of other people’s lives.

Like Jerry Springer, Oprah Winfrey takes TV talk show to its top. But Oprah goes in the opposite direction. The show is mainly about the improvement of society and different quality of life. Contents are from teaching your children lessons, managing your work week, to getting to know your neighbors.

Compared to Oprah, the Jerry Springer show looks like poisonous waste being poured into society. Jerry ends every show with a" final word". He makes a small speech about the entire idea of the show. Hopefully, this is the part where most people will learn something very valuable.

Clean as it is, the Oprah show is not for everyone. The show’s main viewers are middleclass Americans. Most of these people have the time, money, and ability to deal with life’s tough problems. Jerry Springer, on the other hand, has more of a connection with the young adults of society. These are 18 to 21 year olds whose main troubles in life include love, relationship, sex, money and drug. They are the ones who see some value and lessons to be learned through the show’s exploitation.

We can learn from the passage that the two talk shows()

A. have become the only ones of its kind

B. exploit the weaknesses in human nature

C. appear at different times of the day

D. attract different people