问题 判断题

带传动是在两个或多个传动轮之间传递运动和动力的机械传动装臵。()

答案

参考答案:对

阅读理解与欣赏

文段(一)

我们身边的碳排放

“快速时尚”导致浪费

  ①英国《新科学家》杂志报道说,从1990年到2005年,全球纺织品产量从4000万吨升至6000万吨。其中“快速时尚”趋势对纺织品生产和消费激增起了推波助澜的作用。衣服便宜了,消费者穿过几次就丢掉。但便宜衣服通常以人造材料制成,它们由石油化工原料合成,在这一过程中消耗的能源和排放的温室气体远远超过天然织物。而且,这些人造材料难以回收使用,自然降解也需要很长时间。

  少吃牛肉

  ②联合国粮农组织的数据显示,18%的温室气体排放来自于肉类排气。这一数据足以说明有关“食”的碳排放是如何重要。而在肉类消费中,牛产生的温室气体又是最多的,每生产1公斤牛肉相当于向大气排放3.6~6.8公斤二氧化碳。此外,饲料的生产以及饲养牲畜的农场排出废物也都要释放大量温室气体。德国健康杂志报道称,如果饮食中有三成热量是来自红肉(猪牛羊等饱和脂肪酸含量高的肉类)或乳制品,一年所排放的二氧化碳约为1485.1公斤,而对应的白肉(鸡鸭鱼等)一年排放量约为1054.2公斤。

  盖节能房

  ③在寒冷的冬季,建筑取暖系统无疑将消耗大量能源。据英国广播公司报道,未来3年北爱尔兰将建造50多套社会福利房,它们的节能效率超出平均水平75%。

  ④在“住”的领域要减少碳排放,不仅包括房屋设计,房间里的各种设备也同样重要。例如冬季时将空调温度调低2度,夏季调高2度,每年能减少二氧化碳排放量900公斤。

  绿色交通

  ⑤二氧化碳的另一大来源是交通。

  ⑥在欧洲,交通对能源消耗占到整体能源消耗量的20%~30%。减少出行带来的碳排放,第一步就是尽量选择公共交通。美国公共交通联合会称,公共交通每年节省近53亿升天然气,这意味着能减少150万吨二氧化碳排放量。

( 摘自2009年《环球时报》,有改动 )

小题1:文中的划线句分别运用了哪种说明方法?(2分)

                                                                                  

小题2:文章第⑥段加点词“近”能否去掉,为什么?(2分)

                                                                                  

                                                                                  

小题3:阅读本文,谈谈作者写这篇文章分别从哪些方面入手,介绍了我们身边的碳排放?(气管挪用四个字进行概括。)(2分)

                                                                                  

                                                                                  

小题4:除了文中提到的我们身边的碳排放,请你再写两种身边的碳排放方式?对于如何减少我们身边的碳排放,你有哪些具体措施?(3分)

                                                                                  

                                                                                  

小题5:阅读本文,请谈谈作者写作此文的目的是什么?(2分)

                                                                                  

                                                                                  

单项选择题

September 11th 2001 drew the transatlantic alliance together; but the mood did not last, and over the five years since it has pulled ever further apart. A recent poll for the German Marshall Fund shows that 57% of Europeans regard American leadership in world affairs as "undesirable". The Iraq war is mainly to blame. But there is another and more intractable reason for the growing division: God.

Europeans worry that American foreign policy under George Bush is too influenced by religion. The "holy warriors" who hijacked the planes on September 11th reintroduced God into international affairs in the most dramatic of ways. It seems that George Bush is replying in kind, encouraging a clash of religions that could spell global catastrophe.

Dominique Moisi, a special adviser at the French Institute for International Relations, argues that "the combination of religion and nationalism in America is frightening. We feel betrayed by God and by nationalism, which is why we are building the European Union as a barrier to religious warfare." Josef Braml, of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, complains that in America "religious attitudes have more of an influence on political choices than in any other western democracy."

The notion that America is too influenced by religion is not confined to the elites.

Three in five French people and nearly as many Dutch think that Americans are too religious—and that religion skews what should be secular decisions. Europeans who think that America is "too religious" are more inclined to anti-Americanism than their fellow countrymen. 38% of Britons have an unfavourable view of America, but that number rises to 50% among people who are wary of American religiosity.

Is America engaged in a faith-based foreign policy Religion certainly exerts a growing influence on its actions in the world, but in ways more subtle and complicated than Europeans imagine. It is true that America is undergoing a religious revival "Hot" religions such as evangelical Protestantism and hardline Catholicism are growing rapidly while "cool" mainline versions of Christianity are declining. It is also true that the Republican Party is being reshaped by this revival. Self-identified evangelicals provided almost 40% of Mr. Bush’s vote in 2004; if you add in other theological conservatives, such as Mormons and traditional Catholics, that number rises closer to 60%. All six top Republican leaders in the Senate have earned 100% ratings from the Christian Coalition.

It is also true that Mr. Bush frequently uses religious rhetoric when talking of foreign affairs. On September 12th he was at it again, telling a group of conservative journalists that he sees the war on terror as "a confrontation between good and evil", and remarking, "It seems to me that there’s a Third Awakening" (in other words, an outbreak of Christian evangelical fervour, of the sort that has swept across America at least twice before). And Christian America overall is taking a bigger interest in foreign policy. New voices are being heard, Such as Sam Brownback, a conservative senator from Kansas who has led the fight against genocide in Darfur, and Rick Warren, the author of a bestseller called The Purpose-Driven Life, who is sending 2 000 missionaries to Rwanda.

Finally, it is true that religious figures have done some pretty outrageous things. Pat Robertson called for the assassination of Hugo Chavez, the president of Venezuela. Lieu- tenant-General William "Jerry" Boykin, deputy under-secretary of defence for intelligence, toured the country telling Christian groups that radical Muslims hate America "because we’ re a Christian nation and the enemy is a guy named Satan". He often wore uniform.

The author evidences his own notion by advancing ()

A. four facts

B. far-fetched pretexts

C. random hypothesis

D. powerful preachers