问题 开放性试题

下面是发生在某校同学中的四组镜头:

镜头一:小王上学迟到受到老师批评,嘴里嘟哝着:“都怪妈妈没有及时叫醒我。”

镜头二:小李拿着考得不理想的化学试卷,心里暗暗地埋怨:化学老师讲课特没劲,我一点儿兴趣也没有;

镜头三:轮到罗丹他们小组值日,组上其他同学都看球赛去了,他想:都不值日,我也走!

镜头四:在实验室里把试管打碎了,她悄悄地对旁边的同学说:“别吱声,就装不知道。”

(1)请你从责任的角度评价上述镜头中的行为。(5分)

(2)你认为我们应怎样做负责任的公民?(4分)

答案

(1)上述镜头中的行为都是推卸和逃避责任的行为,(2分)是对自己、对他人、对集体不负责任的表现;(3分)(考生只要围绕“是推卸和逃避责任”、是“对自己”、“对他人”、“对集体不负责任”四个方面作答,即可酌情给分)

(2)①要信守承诺。慎重许诺,坚决履行诺言是负责任的表现;②要勇担过错。当我们做错事时,承认错误并承担相应的责任是负责任的表现;③要自觉、主动承担责任,做责任的主人;④要学会反思自己的责任,并在承担责任中不断成长。(4分,每点1分)

题目分析:(1)题文四个镜头中的学生遇到问题首先没有反思自己的行为,而是将责任退给别人。是不负责任的表现。责任体现为对自己负责、对他人负责、对集体负责。

(2)负责任体现为对他人负责,因此,要信守承诺;对自己负责,要主动承担责任,承认错误,并承担相应责任;对集体负责,在集体中树立主人翁意识,主动承担责任。

单项选择题

A few milliamps of electricity can cause plants to increase synthesis of chemicals. These compounds often also have a pharmacological (related to medicine) or commercial value, so the trick could be used to help increase yields of commercially useful biologicals. Artemisinic acid, from sweet wormwood, for example, is used in malarial medications, and shikonin (紫草素), from the purple gromwell plant, is used against skin infections.

Researchers have long known that stressing plants can force them to take defensive action, often ramping up the production of protective chemicals that, for example, make them more resistant to insect attack. It has become common practice to stress such plants into increasing their yields. This is usually clone using physical stress elicitors (诱导子), including bits of the micro-organisms that normally attack the plants, or irritants made from metallic compounds such as copper chloride. These are effective, but they come at a cost. Most elicitors are toxic to plants and can build up in tissues, making it necessary to occasionally "clean" a plant of the chemicals so they keep having the same effect.

Recently, research groups at the University of Arizona in Tucson found that the application of an electric current to the hairy roots of the poisonous herb Hyoscyamus muticus stimulated the production of the herb’s toxin hyoscyamine (天仙子胺). This unpublished finding inspired Hans Van Etten, also of the University of Arizona, and his colleagues to test sub-lethal levels of electrical currents on other plants, to assess electricity’s potential to elevate chemical production.

The researchers exposed eight different plant species (ranging from Japanese pagoda tree seedlings to pea plants) to weak electrical currents of 30 milliamps. Seven of the plants increased their production o defensive chemicals. The average boost of chemical production was 20 times, they report in Biotechnology Progress. One plant, a type of alfalfa, increased its chemical yield by 168 times. These values are very similar to those achieved using chemical elicitors, and seem to have no lethal effects-just a negative effect on growth. The treatment can be used over and over again without the build-up of any unwanted material.

The useful compounds would be very easy to harvest: they simply pour out into solution if the plants are grown hydroponically. "The fact that we can use electricity instead of toxic materials to elicit chemical production is very exciting because it means we get to look at how these chemicals form without having to constantly add and remove toxins from the system," says Van Etten. "This is a really novel and creative approach that I’ve never seen before," says plant metabolic engineer Fabricio Medina Bolivar from Arkansas State University in Jonesboro. "The possibilities for using electricity with plants in this way are absolutely tremendous.

The views of Fabricio and Van Etten towards the way of using electricity to elicit chemical production are ()

A. different

B. opposite

C. similar

D.complementary

多项选择题