问题 选择题

“三鹿奶粉”事件发生后,党中央、国务院高度重视,做出了重大部署:国家质检总局加大了对市场奶制品的检查力度;三鹿集团公司主要负责人涉嫌犯罪被刑事拘留;抓捕了以张玉军为首的非法制售含三聚氰胺“蛋白粉”的犯罪团伙。这表明              [ ]

①中 * * 党代表中国最广大人民的最根本利益

②正义要求每个人都必须遵守社会生活中的制度、规则和程序,没有人可以例外

③非正义行为损害公共利益和他人的正当权益,必然受到法律制裁

④中国产品全是假的,还是外国产品好

A、①②              

B、②③              

C、①②③        

D、①②③④

答案

答案:C

单项选择题
问答题

Dongfang Import & Export Co (Dongfang Co) and Lidar Steel Company (Steel Co) entered into a cooperation contract. According to the contract Dongfang Co was responsible for the importation of 10,000 metric ton (M/T) of iron ore and exportation of pig iron 6,000 M/T, while Steel Co was responsible for the processing of iron ore into pig iron; Steel Co was also under the obligation to complete the processing within 10 days upon the arrival of iron ore and then carry the pig iron to Tianjin port for export by Dongfang Co.On 10 March 2008 the first shipment of 5,000 M/T iron ore arrived at the designated port and was promptly carried to the premises of Steel Co for processing.10 days later the second shipment of 5,000 M/T arrived at the Chinese port. However Dongfang Co found that several bank accounts of Steel Co were frozen by the order of the court in a dispute with a third party. Therefore, it immediately despatched a written memo to Steel Co, stating that it would detain the second shipment of iron ore until Steel Co delivered the processed pig iron.Upon the receipt of the notice, Steel Co sent back a fax to express its sincere regret for its delay to deliver pig iron. Steel Co emphasised, however, that it suffered from insufficient funds to buy coke for the processing. It promised to make efforts to deal with this problem, but failed to specify any concrete measures to be taken or give the necessary security for the performance of the contractual obligation. Steel Co also urged that Dongfang Co deliver the remaining 5,000 M/T of iron ore.Considering the date for the shipment of pig iron was approaching but Steel Co did not deliver any processed pig iron, Dongfang Co declared the dissolution of the cooperation contract and sold the remaining 5,000 M/T of iron ore to a third party. Under such circumstances Steel Co brought an action against Dongfang Co for damages on the ground that Dongfang refused to deliver the second shipment of 5,000 M/T iron ore for processing.Required:Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Contract Law of China, and give your reasons for your answer:

(b) State whether Dongfang Co was entitled to dissolve the cooperation contract and sell the remaining iron ore to a third party; and (3 marks)