问题 选择题

古罗马法学家盖尤斯记述过一个案例:有人砍伐邻居家的葡萄树,被告上法庭,原告虽提供了确凿证据,却输掉了官司。原因是原告在法庭辩论中把“葡萄树”说成了“葡萄”,而《十二铜表法》只规定了非法砍伐他人“树木”应处以罚金。该案例说明当时在罗马

A.不重视私有财产的保护

B.法律具有形式主义特征

C.审判程序缺乏公正性

D.审判结果取决于对法律的解释

答案

答案:B

题目分析:本题主要考查古代罗马的法律度。从材料的内容可知,原告因为在法庭辩论中把“葡萄树”说成了“葡萄”,而不符合《十二铜表法》的规定:非法砍伐他人“树木”应处罚金,就输掉了官司。这体现了罗马法律的形式主义的特点。所以应选B。

阅读理解

阅读理解。

     I have a friend. He has a large police dog. The dog's name.is Jack. Police dogs are often very clever.

Every Sunday afternoon my friend takes Jack for a long walk in the park. Jack likes the long walk very much.

One Sunday afternoon, a young man came to visit my friend. They talked and talked. Soon it was time for my

friend to take Jack for his walk. But the visitor was still there. Jack became very worried about his walk in the

park. He walked around the room a few times, and then sat down directly in front of the visitor and looked at

him. But the visitor paid no attention. He went on talking. Finally Jack could no longer stand it. He went out of

the room and a few minutes later he came back with the visitor's hat in the mouth.

( )1. A. The writer's friend has a police dog named Jack.

           B. The writer's friend's name is Jack. 

           C. The writer's name is Jack

(      )2. A. Every Sunday afternoon the writer's friend goes to the park for a walk. 

            B. Every Sunday afternoon the dog goes to the park for a long walk.

            C. Every Sunday afternoon the writer s friend and his dog go to the park for a long walk.

(      )3. A. The visitor was old.

            B. The visitor was young.

            C. The visitor was neither old nor young

(      )4. A. The visitor paid attention to the dog.

            B. The visitor paid a little attention to the dog.

            C. The visitor paid no attention to the dog.

(      )5. A. The visitor came back with his hat in his hand.

            B. The dog came back with the visitor's hat in his mouth.

            C. The writer s friend came back with the visitor's hat in his hand.

多项选择题