问题 阅读理解

One day, little Mike's mother went to the river to do some washing.Before she left, she said to him: “Mike,while I am away, stay near the door and watch it all the time! ”She said this because she was afraid of the thieves.

Mike sat down beside the door.After an hour,one of his uncles came.He asked Mike, “Where is your mother? ”  “She has gone to the river to do some washing.”Mike answered."“Well.”said his uncle, “now it is a quarter to two.Three hours later we are going to visit your family.Go and tell her about it,for I'm too busy, I have to hurry...”

After his uncle had gone away,Mike began to think , “Mother had asked me to watch the door all the time and my uncle told me to go and tell my mother. What shall I do?”he thought and thought. Finally he pulled down the door, put it on his back and went to the river with it.

小题1: What did Mike's mother ask him to do while she was away?_________.

A.To wait for her.

B.To watch the house.

C.To look after the child.

D.To wait for his uncle.小题2: How many uncles did Mike have?_________.

A.One.

B.Two.

C.Three.

D.We don't know.小题3:. What should Mike do?_________.

A.He should lock the door before he went to the river.

B.He should ask his uncle to tell his mother.

C.He should go to the river with the door open.

D.He should watch the door all the time.

答案

小题1:.B

小题2:.D

小题3:A

题目分析:

小题1:.通过She said this because she was afraid of the thieves.可知,迈克的妈妈是让迈克看家。所以本题选B。

小题2:文中只出现了one of his uncles,所以我们并不知道迈克有多少叔叔。所以本题选D。

小题3:根据常识我们可以知道,迈克去河边之前,应该锁上门。所以本题应该选A。而B说让他的叔叔告诉他的妈妈,根据文章可知,是不可能的;C说开着门去河边,正是他妈妈不允许的;D说,他应该一直看门,如果这样就不能告诉他说妈妈。所以本题选A。

点评:本文是一则笑话,讲述了迈克的妈妈让他看门,而他的叔叔让他去告诉他妈妈事情,使他左右为难,最后背着门去找他妈妈的故事。本文是记叙文,应该理清思路,按时间的顺序,把握事情的来龙去脉。在阅读时,尽量将问题在短文中找出相同或相似的地方,再加以分析。

单项选择题
问答题

案情:2006年9月19日,小学生张某(11岁)、王某(10岁)、李某(10岁)在回家途中,看见在对面河边洗衣服的同班同学林某(10岁),张某即提议三人用石子砸林某洗的衣服。于是,三人纷纷用石子砸向林某。林某见有石子砸来,躲闪不及,被一颗石子砸中右眼。随后,林某被亲属送往某市人民医院治疗,被诊断为右眼眼球裂伤,视力为“0”。林某在住院期间,花费医疗费、交通费、住宿费、营养费等共计人民币50050元。事后,林某的父母为林某受伤赔偿一事,多次与张某、王某和李某的父母进行交涉,均遭拒绝。张某、王某和李某的父母均否认是自己的孩子打伤了林某。林某的父母遂向法院提起诉讼,请求张某、王某和李某的父母赔偿医疗费、交通费、住宿费和营养费共计50050元。
一审审理过程中,原告向法院提交了各项费用的单据,但无法证明具体是谁砸中了林某;被告则均否认自己砸中了林某。一审判决认为,原告的损害事实确有依据,但原告未能举证证明被告的行为与其损害结果之间存在因果关系,故认定被告的行为不构成侵权;被告的行为虽然与原告所受损害没有直接因果关系,但具有一定的过错,应该给予原告一定的精神损害赔偿。一审法院判决被告赔偿原告精神损害抚慰金5000元,判决驳回原告其他的诉讼请求。一审判决送达后,一审原告、被告均提出了上诉。二审法院经过书面审查,未接触当事人,直接撤销原判发回重审。
问题:
1.本案的当事人应当如何列明