搜题请搜索小程序“爱下问搜题”
问题

读下图回答问题。

（1）这是近代史中哪一次战争的示意图？

__________________________________________________________________

（2）战争结束后双方签订了什么条约？条约的主要内容是什么？

__________________________________________________________________

（3）条约给中国造成了什么危害？

__________________________________________________________________

（4）条约中被割占的领土哪一年被收回？

__________________________________________________________________

答案

（1）1894至1895年的甲午中日战争示意图。

（2）中日《马关条约》。主要内容有：赔款白银2亿两；割占辽东半岛、台湾岛、澎湖列岛给日本；允许日本在通商口岸开设工厂；增开通商口岸。

（3）使中国半殖民地半封建社会的程度大大加深。

（4）1945年8月，抗日战争胜利，日本战败投降。

单项选择题

下列哪项影像表现的描述符合甲状腺癌转移

A．双肺弥漫小结节，伴高热、盗汗、咯血
B．双肺弥漫粟粒性小结节，有甲状腺癌病史
C．体检发现双肺弥漫小结节，伴肺门对称性淋巴结肿大
D．双肺弥漫小结节，患者从事采矿作业
E．双肺弥漫小结节，伴肾脏损害，持续高热抗感染治疗无效
查看答案
单项选择题


With 2005 fast becoming "the year of the natural disaster", it is time to reflect on how engineering, science and technology can play their fullest part in protecting the planet.
Long before the Asian tsunami struck, the science community predicted the particular region of Indonesia to be hit by the next big earthquake; and the engineering and technology community had developed early warning systems costing only ＄ 30 million. But no government in the region heeded the warnings and no early warning systems were in place. We ignored technology of the advance warnings at our peril of 100,000 victims of the tsunami.
Governments are not alone in ignoring the views of their scientific community; the public too has its doubts. Part of the reason for this lack of confidence must be down to the failure to engage them in a meaningful way about their concerns. Trust is a two-way street. Instead of claiming that everything would be rosy in the scientific garden "if only the public understood", we must work hard to explore concerns, discover fears and delve deep into the depths of public perceptions. We are getting there. There is a growing realization that effective public engagement is of far greater value than banging the "public understanding" drum.
There are still doubters, of course, and sadly their cause is helped whenever they come across opinions presented as fact. All of us must guard against this debilitating practice. In time, effective public engagement should help deliver improved trust as well as better policy, which -- in turn -- might make it more difficult for scientists’ warnings to be ignored.
Today’s technology community is a triumph of international collaboration where engineers and scientists combine to develop solutions to our biggest problems. Of course, technology cannot stop natural disasters but it can mitigate their impact. We are able to identify the birds affected by avian flu. We can chart their migration patterns around the world. We have the means to pursue vaccines. And we have the communication channels to keep people informed.
Extolling the virtues of technology is not to pretend technology is perfect in every regard. Far from it. The profligate and unsustainable use of technology in energy and transport has contributed to climate change. But that doesn’t mean technology has failed us. We must never lose sight of the fact that technology itself will deliver the solutions to the very problems it can create. If we do, technology will remain sidelined and undervalued, and this major social failure will progressively disadvantage us all.
Our vision is of a society embracing technology as a weapon of both progress and defense. Since the beginning of civilization, we have relied on it and enjoyed its benefits -- and most new technologies have had hugely beneficial effects for most people. But now, in an age when the death toll from natural disasters is increasing year on year, with more people living in danger zones, it is ever more urgent that we rely on science and technology to warn us of the dangers to come and provide the solutions we need.

"The Year of the Natural Disaster" tells us that ______.

A．we suffered a lot in recent years

B．engineering, science and technology can play their important part

C．Asian Tsunami caused death of 100,000 victims

D．no government paid enough attention to the early warnings
查看答案