Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers during the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage.
It is difficult to the point of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most big-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.
We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War 2, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the Publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviews who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about. These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press. "So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism," Newman wrote, "that I am tempted to define ’journalism’ as ’a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are’."
Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten. Neville Cardus, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now known solely as a writer of essays on the game of cricket. During his lifetime, though, he was also one of England’s foremost classical-music critics, and a stylist so widely admired that his Autobiography (1947) became a best-seller. He was knighted in 1967, the first music critic to be so honored. Yet only one of his books is now in print, and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists.
Is there any chance that Cardus’s criticism will enjoy a revival The prospect seems remote. Journalistic tastes had changed long before his death, and postmodern readers have little use for the richly upholstered Vicwardian prose in which he specialized. Moreover, the amateur tradition in music criticism has been in headlong retreat.
What would be the best title for the text()
A. Newspapers of the Good Old Days
B.The Lost Horizon in Newspapers
C. Mournful Decline of Journalism
D. Prominent Critics in Memory
参考答案:C
解析:
[定位] 根据题干,要获得该题答案,需要纵观全文。
主旨题。纵观全文,文章第一段提到了新闻业的评论水平出现了下滑;第二段对第一段的内容进行详细阐述;第三段开始提引了我们目前的评论水平甚至不如之前的unfocused reviews;第四段表达了对于知名评论家的遗忘感到惋惜;而最后一段更是期盼能够再度流行Cardus’s criticism,可是作者自己也明白不可能。这些都表示了对于新闻业的不断衰退的惋惜,故选C。
[避错] 选项A:报纸业曾经的辉煌时期。原文中对该部分的叙述只是文章的铺垫,而非主题。选项B:报纸业中消失的地平线。原文中没有提到。选项D:记忆中杰出的评论家。文章中对杰出评论家的描述主要是为了表现对他们以及其作品永远逝去的惋惜,而并非是要介绍这些评论家。
[点睛] 在考查主旨时,只要能够把握各个段落的中心句,归纳主旨就会容易一些。