问题 材料题

2011年是辛亥革命爆发一百年,各地丰富多彩的纪念活动已经拉开序幕。阅读下列材料,回答问题。

材料一 1912年元旦,以孙中山为首的南京临时政府颁布了《中华民国国歌》:“东亚开化中华早,揖美追欧,旧邦新造,飘扬五色旗,国民荣光,锦绣山河普照,我同胞,鼓舞文明,世界和平永保。”

材料二 1912年-1921年民族工业名牌产品表

行业
企业名称
经营者
籍贯
面粉、棉纱
茂新、福新等公司
荣宗敬、荣德生兄弟
江苏无锡
酿酒
张裕酿酒公司
张弼士(本为华侨)
广东大埔
火柴
鸿生火柴公司
刘鸿生
浙江定海
化工
永利化学工业公司
范旭东
湖南湘阴
机器制造
求新机器制造厂
朱志尧
上海

材料三 孙中山先生逝世后,中 * * 党人继承孙中山先生的遗志,团结带领全国各族人民夺取了新民主主义革命的胜利,实现了民族独立和人民解放,建立了人民当家作主的社会主义国家 * * ,开展了大规模的社会主义建设。特别是改革开放以来,中 * * 党团结带领全国各族人民在中国特色社会主义道路上开拓前进,取得了举世公认的伟大成就,中国的面貌发生了举世瞩目的深刻变化——胡 * * 在孙中山先生诞辰140周年(1)依据材料一,分析《中华民国国歌》表达了怎样的政治愿望。为实现”,民国政府在政治、经济、文化生活方面采取了哪些措施?(各举一例)                                                                                                                                                                  (2)根据材料二及所学知识,分析表格中民族工业发展的特点,并指出这一时期民族资本主义的发展对中国社会变革产生了怎样的政治影响。                                                                                                                                                                   (3)根据材料三并结合所学知识,说明 * * 党人对孙中山先生革命事业的继承与发展。

                                                                                                                                                                 

答案

(1)政治愿望:资产阶级民主共和;世界和平。措施:政治—颁布《临时约法》,确立共和政体。经济—奖励实业,鼓励发展民族资本主义工商业。文化生活—剪辫子;在称呼上,改”;在礼仪上,改跪拜为握手等。

(2)特点:工业结构比例失调,轻工业发展较快;重工业和新兴的化工工业获得一定程度的发展。政治影响:资产阶级力量壮大,发起新文化运动。中国无产阶级队伍的壮大,为实现中国革命由旧民主主义革命向新民主主义革命的转变和中 * * 党的成立,提供了阶级基础。

(4)继承与发展:取得了新民主主义革命的胜利,实现了民族独立和人民民主;领导中国人民走上了中国特色社会主义道路;经济快速增长,社会生产力迅速发展,人民生活朝着小康社会迈进。

选择题
单项选择题

It’s a cliche—but true—that a huge obstacle to a per economic recovery is the lack of confidence in a p recovery. If consumers and businesses were more confident, they would be spending, hiring and lending more freely. Instead, we’re deluged with reports suggesting that, because the recession was so deep, it will take many years to regain anything like the pre-crisis prosperity. Just last week, for example, the McKinsey Global Institute released a study estimating that the country needs 21 million additional jobs by 2020 to reduce the unemployment rate to 5 percent. The study was skeptical that this would happen. Pessimism and slow growth become a vicious cycle.

Battered confidence most obviously reflects the ferocity and shock of the financial collapse and the ensuing recession, including the devastating housing collapse. But there’s another, less appreciated cause: disillusion with modern economics. Probably without realizing it, most Americans had accepted the fundamental promises of contemporary economics. These were: First, we know enough to prevent another Great Depression; second, although we can’t prevent every recession, we know enough to ensure sustained and, for the most part, p recoveries. These propositions, endorsed by most economists, had worked themselves into society’s belief structure.

Embracing them does not preclude economic disappointments, setbacks, worries or risks. But for most people most of the time, it does preclude economic calamity. People felt protected. If you stop believing them, then you act differently. You begin shielding yourself, as best you can, against circumstances and dangers that you can’t foresee but that you fear are there. You become more cautious. You hesitate more before making a big commitment-buying a home or car, if you’re a consumer; hiring workers, if you’re an employer; starting a new business, if you’re an entrepreneur; or making loans, if you’re a banker. Almost everyone is hunkered down in some way.

One disturbing fact from the McKinsey report is this: The number of new businesses, a traditional source of jobs, was down 23 percent in 9,010 from 2007; the level was the lowest since 1983, when America had about 75 million fewer people. Large corporations are standoffish. They have about $2 trillion of cash and securities on their balance sheets, which could be used for hiring and investing in new products.

It’s not that economics achieved nothing. The emergency measures thrown at the crisis in many countries exceptionally low interest rates, "stimulus" programs of extra spending and tax cuts—probably averted another Depression. But it’s also true that there’s now no consensus among economists as to how to strengthen the recovery. Economists suffer from what one of them calls "the pretense-of-knowledge syndrome." They act as if they understand more than they do and presume that their policies, whether of the left or right, have benefits more predictable than they actually are. It’s worth remembering that the recovery’s present slowdown is occurring despite measures taken to speed it up.

So modern economics has been oversold, and the public is now disbelieving. The disillusion feeds stubbornly low confidence.

The "pretense-of-knowledge syndrome" refers to()

A. the belief of economists about bow economic things work

B. the illness that is damaging the health of today’s economy

C. the consensus that there is no quick fix for economic recession

D. the ineffective measures taken to correct the economic crisis