问题 单项选择题

【真题试题】(2008年单项选择第25题)甲向乙借款,丙为此提供连带保证担保。按照借款合同约定,甲的还款日期为2003年1o月1日。但直到2006年5月1日,乙从来没有向甲或者丙提出过任何还款请求。时至2006年5月2日,乙请求甲还款。甲说:“我虽然也知道已经超过了2年的诉讼时效期限,但我还是愿意偿还借款。可是我现在没有钱,你可以请求丙承担保证责任。”乙便请求丙承担保证责任。那么,下列表述中正确的是(  )。

A.丙应当无条件承担保证责任,因为甲已经表示愿意继续承担债务

B.丙应当承担保证责任,因为其承担的是连带保证责任

C.丙不承担保证责任,但应承担赔偿责任

D.丙可以主张已过诉讼时效的抗辩,该抗辩不因甲的放弃而受影响

答案

参考答案:D

解析:【真题解析】本题考查连带责任保证的保证期间问题。《担保法》第26条规定:“连带责任保证的保证人与债权人未约定保证期间的,债权人有权自主债务履行期届满之日起六个月内要求保证人承担保证责任。”“在合同约定的保证期间和前款规定的保证期间,债权人未要求保证人承担保证责任的,保证人免除保证责任。”在本题中,由于乙、丙之间未约定保证期间,故其保证期间应当为主债务履行期届满之日起六个月。由于乙在此期间内未请求丙法|律教育网承担保证责任,故丙应免除保证责任。此后不论甲、乙之间的债权债务关系是否已过诉讼时效,均不能使保证人再重新承担保证责任。因此,选项D正确。

选择题
问答题

Children in any society are expected to learn to conform to a number of social rules and expectations if they are to become participants in the culture. (46)Among the rules that children in our society are expected to learn are that certain classes of adults (such as teachers and doctors) are addressed by titles, that males and females use separate restroom facilities, and that women but not men wear dresses. These are examples of social conventions. In the absence of such a shared norm, the acts are neither right nor wrong. For this reason, conventions may be said to be arbitrary. For example, (47)we could just as easily have students address teachers by first names as have them call teachers by their last names and formal titles of Mr. or Ms.
Conventions, however, serve an important function by providing predictability and order to social life. (48)Without social conventions it would be impossible to organize social institutions such as schools, and societies as organized systems could not exist. The arbitrariness of conventions makes their importance difficult for children to figure out. (49) It is not until some time in adolescence that children come to fully understand the function that these arbitrary conventions serve to provide predictability and order to our social interactions.
In contrast with issues of convention are matters of morality. Morality refers to issues of human welfare, justice, and rights that are a function of the inherent features of interpersonal relations. Because of this, the right and wrong of moral actions are not simply determined by social consensus or the views of authority. For example, it is not possible to hit another person with force and not hurt the other person. Similarly, it is not possible to steal something valuable from someone else and not cause the person to experience the sense of loss. A moral judgment about unprovoked harm ( "It is wrong to hit") would not be dependent on the existence of a socially agreed upon rule or standard but could be generated solely from the intrinsic effects of the act (i.e., hitting hurts). (50)Similar analyses could be done regarding a broader range of issues that would extend beyond direct harm to concerns for what it means to be just, compassionate, and considerate of the rights of others.