问题 写作题

请以“畅饮回忆”为题写一篇文章。(60分)

要求:除诗歌外,文体不限,不少于800字。

答案

【例文】

畅饮回忆

回忆是一种特殊的味道,它是用岁月作催化剂,用经历作调味品而酝酿出来的。它犹如醇香的美酒,呷一小口,沁人心脾,意犹未尽……

漫溯历史的长河,我们不会忘记北海牧羊十九载的苏武,不会忘记了却君王天下事的辛弃疾,更不会忘记在赤壁独自长吟的苏轼,回顾他们,我们看到了源远长河中的文人豪情,悠悠历史上的脱尘气节。

九万里的情怀荡漾于三千里江波之上,赤子之心归于自然,终成南华真经。重拾庄子,学习他逍遥一游于尘世,便铸就了哲学的巅峰。他有蛇的冷酷犀利,更有鸽子的温柔宽仁,踌躇满志却又似是而非,螳臂当车却又游刃有余。回顾他,看出了他荒唐言中的一把辛酸泪,和对这种充满血泪的怪诞与孤傲。于是我肃然起敬,渺然身受。

楚大夫屈原沉吟泽畔,若有所思,怀王外欺张仪,内惑郑袖,蒙蔽视听,听信谗言,国将不国,屈原心急如焚,怎奈回天无力,于是怀着一腔忠诚投进了汨罗江。高山流水心自知,漫漫求索,他那爱国热情穿越时空,永驻在世人心中。

惶恐滩头,零丁洋里,涛声依旧,叹息不再。然而时间只侵蚀了一个人的物质存在,却无法磨灭煌煌诗句中的记忆。谁能忘却文天祥的辛苦遭逢,干戈寥落?“天地有正气,杂然赋流形,”每一个人,在翻开那惊天地泣鬼神的一页时,不免从记忆深处被那悲怆的生命所震撼,时间能磨淡书迹却无法抹去回忆。

若雨品词,我听到历史的磨盘在轰然作响,辛弃疾披一身豪情向报国的前线冲去,不料身后轰响而来的是 * * 佞的诽谤,昏君的顾疑。他忍受着屈辱与愤怒,但为国而沉默,于是他像一粒铜豆在磨盘中滚动。他“把栏杆拍遍”,在“深山闻鹧鸪”中凄凉地为国献出一生。于是这样的一位 * * 被逼迫成伟大的词人,他把文字铭刻成钢刀,劈开了人们蓦然回首咀嚼灯火阑珊的回忆。

回忆,穿越岁月风尘而历久弥新;回忆,跨过历史长河而亘古不变。时间带走的,只是表盘上的分分秒秒,而长存于人类心中的记忆,就像那饱经风霜的常青树,永不老去。畅饮回忆,让湮没不了的文人骚客在落花飘香之时,彰显出悸动心灵的神韵。畅饮回忆,怀古念史,承载记忆,铸就自我……

【点评】 模拟评分 内容19分 表达19分 发展19分=总分57分

评分依据:此文构思精妙,文笔清新洒脱,充满诗意画意,怀古念史,向我们展示了作者丰富的文史知识,在众多材料的烘托下,很好地表现了“畅饮回忆”这个主题。是一篇内容和形式都较好的佳作。

一是要注意选材。要选用过去曾激动人心、叫人回味品咂的材料,就是指材料不仅能给读者以回味和共鸣感,而且能使读者感到生动有趣,这些材料包括人、事、思想、风尚、认识等。

二是注意命题的特点,因为是回忆性的内容,在记事或写人时,一定是要注重观念的更新,要善于感受时代气息,提炼生活中曾给人以启迪的积极向上的事例与人物,让人读后有所启发与思考。

三要富有个性,表述真情。人常说“同题作文新者胜”,这个“新”除了结构新、立意新之外,也要注意语言新。

单项选择题
问答题

It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. (46) You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. (47) It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering the way ahead seems. (48) It is this sudden confrontation with the depth and scope of ignorance that’ represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. (49) It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not so bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. (50) To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention.