问题 论述题

材料一:宝钢是中国最具竞争力的钢铁企业,年产钢能力为3000万吨左右,营利水平居世界领先地位,产品畅销国内外市场。

材料二:宝钢主要实施“三战略、一注重”原则:实施钢铁精品战略,建成中国钢铁工业新技术、新工艺、新材料的研发基地;实施适度相关多元化战略,除钢铁主业外,还涉足贸易、金融、工程技术、信息、煤化工、钢材深加工、综合利用等多元产业;实施国际化经营战略,已形成了近20个境外和国内贸易公司组成的全球营销网络;注重环境保护,着力打造产品质量。同时,宝钢热心回报社会,资助社会公益事业,企业的社会形象很好。

运用所学经济生活有关知识,回答下列问题。

小题1:材料1和材料2分别说明了什么经济现象?二者存在着什么关系?(4分)

小题2:宝钢的发展对企业的经营有何启示?(6分)

答案

小题1:经济现象:材料1表明宝钢具有较强的市场竞争力,营利水平居世界前列。材料2表明宝钢制定和实施了一系列促进企业发展的经营战略。(2分)二者的关系:正是由于宝钢制定了适合自身发展的经营战略,才使它取得了经营的成功。(2分)

小题2:①企业必须制定正确的经营战略,做好战略定位,顺应时代发展的潮流,抓住机遇,加快发展。②企业必须依靠科技进步、科学管理等手段,形成自己的竞争优势。③企业必须诚信经营,树立良好的信誉和企业形象。④企业必须把经济效益和社会效益统一起来,既要提高竞争能力,又要为社会的发展作出贡献(或企业应该履行一定的社会责任)。(答出3点即可,每小点2分)

题目分析:本题以宝钢的经营成功这一材料为背景考查学生对教材知识的理解和运用能力。小题1:回答第(|)问时,要注意审题,是材料1和材料2分别说明了什么经济现象。要分别说明,并指出两则材料之间的联系。

小题2:第(2)问从企业如何经营成功角度思考即可。结合课本知识可从制定正确的经营战略,依靠科技进步、科学管理等手段,形成自己的竞争优势,诚信经营,树立良好的信誉和企业形象,把经济效益和社会效益统一起来等方面组织答案。

点评:做主观题第一步,审读设问,明确答题方向。依据设问,明确答题的知识范围和答题方向,可以通过设问中的关键词或者所涉及的主体进行定位。第二步,审读材料,提取有效信息。依据设问限定,审读材料,提取有效地材料信息。第三步,依据材料信息与设问限定,整合知识,组织答案。

单项选择题
问答题

It’s a safe bet that the millions of Americans who have recently changed their minds about global warming--deciding it isn’t happening, or isn’t due to human activities such as burning coal and oil, or isn’t a serious threat--didn’t just spend an intense few days poring over climate-change studies and decide, holy cow, the discrimination of continuous equations in general circulation models is completely wrong! Instead, the backlash (an 18-point rise since 2006 in the percentage who say the risk of climate change is exaggerated, Gallup found this month) has been stoked by scientists’ abysmal communication skills, plus some peculiarly American attitudes, both brought into play now by how critics have spun the "Climategate" e-mails to make it seem as if scientists have pulled a fast one.
Scientists are lousy communicators. They appeal to people’s heads, not their hearts or guts, argues Randy Olson, who left a professorship in marine biology to make science films. "Scientists think of themselves as guardians of truth," he says. "Once they have spewed it out, they feel the burden is on the audience to understand it" and agree.
That may work if the topic is something with no emotional content, such as how black holes forms, but since climate change and how to address it make people feel threatened, that arrogance is a disaster. Yet just as smarter-than-thou condescension happens time after time in debates between evolutionary biologists and proponents of intelligent design (the latter almost always win), now it’s happening with climate change. In his 2009 book, Don’t Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style, Olson recounts a 2007 debate where a scientist contending that global warming is a crisis said his opponents failed to argue in a way "that the people here will understand. " His sophisticated, educated Manhattan audience groaned and, thoroughly insulted, voted that the "not a crisis" side won.
Like evolutionary biologists before them, climate scientists also have failed to master "truthiness" (thank you, Stephen Colbert), which their opponent--climate deniers and creationists--wield like a shiv. They say the Intergovemmental Panel on climate Change is a political, not a scientific, organization; a climate mafia (like evolutionary biologists) keeps contrarian papers out of the top journals; Washington got two feet of snow, and you say the world is warming’
There is less backlash against climate science in Europe and Japan, and the U. S. is 33rd out of 34 developed countries in the percentage of adults who agree that species, including humans, evolved. That suggests there is something peculiarly American about the rejection of science. Charles Harper, a devout Christian who for years ran the program bridging science and faith at the Templeton Foundation and who has had more than his share of arguments with people who view science as the Devil’s spawn, has some hypotheses about why that is. "In America, people do not bow to authority the way they do in England," be says. "when the lumpenproletariat are told they have to think in a certain way, there is a backlash," as with climate science now and, never-endingly, with evolution. (Harper, who studied planetary atmospheres before leaving science, calls climate scientists "a smug community of true believers. ")
Another factor is that the ideas of the Reformatio--no intermediaries between people and God; anyone can read the Bible and know the truth as well as a theologia--inform the American character more ply than they do that of many other nations. "It’s the idea that everyone has equal access to the divine," says Harper. That has been extended to the belief that anyone with an Internet connection can know as much about climate or evolution as an expert. Finally, Americans carry in their bones the country’ s history of being populated by emigrants fed up with hierarchy. It is the American way to distrust those who set themselves up-even justifiably--as authorities. Presto: climate backlash.
One new actor is also at work. the growing belief in the wisdom of crowds (Wikis, polling the audience on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire). If tweeting for advice on the best route somewhere yields the right answer. Americans seem to have decided, it doesn’t take any special expertise to pick apart evolutionary biology or climate science. My final hypothesis, the Great Recession was caused by the smartest guys in the room saying, trust us, we understand how credit default swaps work, and they’re great. No wonder so many Americans have decided that experts are idiots.

1.What is the "Climategate" What is the recent debate about global warming