问题 单项选择题

在一份合同纠纷中,甲仲裁员认为李某应赔偿8万元,乙仲裁员认为李某应赔偿12万元,首席仲裁员丙认为李某不应承担任何责任。对该案应如何裁决

A.按首席仲裁员丙的意见作出

B.由仲裁委员会决定

C.由仲裁委员会主任决定

D.重新组成合议仲裁庭进行仲裁

答案

参考答案:A

解析: 本题考查仲裁裁决的作出。根据《仲裁法》第53条,裁决应当按照多数仲裁员的意见作出,少数仲裁员的不同意见可以记人笔录三仲裁庭不能形成多数意见时,裁决应当按照首席仲裁员的意见作出。

问答题

案例分析题八(本题20分。本题为选答题,在案例分析题八、案例分析题九中应选一题作答) 甲公司是一家生产和销售钢铁的A股上市公司,其母公司为XYZ集团公司,甲公司为实现规模化经营、提升市场竞争力,多次通过资本市场融资成功进行了同行业并购,迅速扩大和提高了公司的生产能力和技术创新能力,奠定了公司在钢铁行业的地位,实现了跨越式发展,在一系列并购过程中,甲公司根据目标公司的具体情况,主要采取了现金购买、承债和股份置换三种方式进行。甲公司的三次并购过程要点如下: (1)收购乙公司。乙公司是XYZ集团公司于2000年设立的一家全资子公司,其主营业务是生产和销售钢铁。甲公司为实现“立足华北、面向国际和国内市场”的发展战略,2007年6月30日,采用承担乙公司全部债务的方式收购乙公司,取得了控制权。当日,甲公司的股本为100亿元,资本公积(股本溢价)为120亿元,留存收益为50亿元;乙公司净资产账面价值为0.6亿元(公允价值为1亿元),负债合计为1亿元(公允价值与账面价值相同)。并购完成后,甲公司2007年整合了乙公司财务、研发、营销等部门和人员,并追加资金2亿元对乙公司进行技术改造,提高了乙公司产品技术等级并大幅度扩大了生产能力。 (2)收购丙公司。丙公司同为一家钢铁制造企业,丙公司与甲公司并购前不存在关联方关系。2008年12月31日,甲公司支付现金4亿元成功收购了丙公司的全部可辨认净资产(账面价值为3.2亿元,公允价值为3.5亿元),取得了控制权。并购完成后,甲公司对丙公司引入了科学运行机制、管理制度和先进经营理念,同时追加资金3亿元对丙公司钢铁的生产技术进行改造,极大地提高了丙公司产品质量和市场竞争力。 (3)收购丁公司。丁公司是一家专门生产铁矿石的A股上市公司,丁公司与甲公司并购前不存在关联方关系。2009年6月30日,甲公司经批准通过定向增发1亿股(公允价值为5亿元)换入丁公司的0.6亿股(占丁公司股份的60%),控制了丁公司。当日,丁公司可辨认净资产公允价值为10亿元。甲公司控制丁公司后,向其输入了新的管理理念和模式,进一步完善了丁公司的公司治理结构,提高了规范运作水平,使丁公司从2009年下半年以来业绩稳步攀升。 假定不考虑其他因素。 要求:

简要说明甲公司上述三次并购取得成功的原因。

单项选择题

In one sense, we can trace all the problems of the American city back (91) a single starting point: we Americans don’t like our cities very much.
That is, on the (92) of it, absurd. After all, more than three-fourths of us now live in cities, and more are (93) to them every year. We are told that the problems of our cities are (94) more attention in Washington, and scholarship has discovered a whole new (95) in urban studies.
(96) , it is historically true: in the American psychology, the city has been a basically suspect institution, (97) with the corruption of Europe, totally lacking that sense of spaciousness and innocence of the (98) and the rural landscape.
I don’t pretend to be a scholar on the history of the city in American life. But my thirteen years in public (99) , first as an officer of the U. S. Department of Justice, then as Congressman, and now as Mayor of the biggest city in America have taught me (100) too well the fact that a p antiurban attitude (101) consistently through the mainstream of American thinking. Much of the (102) behind the settlement of America was in reaction (103) the conditions in European industrial centers and much of the theory (104) the basis of freedom in America was linked directly to the availability of land and the perfectibility of man outside the corrupt influences of the city.
What has this to do with the predicament of the modern city I think it has (105) to do with it. For the fact is that the United States (106) the federal government, which has historically established our national priorities, has simply never thought that the American city was "worthy" of (107) —at least not to the (108) of expending any basic resources on it.
Antipathy to the city predates the American experience. When industrialization (109) the European working man into the major cities of the continent, books and pamphlets appeared (110) the city as a source of crime, corruption, filth, disease, vice, licentiousness, subversion, and high prices.

A.compulsion

B.drive

C.enthusiasm

D.zest