问题 写作题

阅读下面的文字,根据要求写一篇不少于800字的文章。

一个年轻的居士去拜访一位高僧。中午时分,小和尚见二人谈话投机,便为他们准备了一大一小两碗面。高僧将大碗推到居士面前请他吃,居士不作推让,张口就吃。高僧见他没作谦让,不禁脸有愠色。居士吃完,见高僧未动筷子,解释道:“我确实饿了,如果我将大碗再推到您面前,并不是我的本意。既然不是本意,我为什么要故作谦恭呢?与其推来让去,不如按照自己的本意,简单地处理事情岂不更好。”高僧点头称赞。

要求选好角度,确定立意,明确文体,自拟标题;不要脱离材料内容及含意的范围作文,不要套作,不得抄袭。

答案

愿从我心

或动如惊雷疾电直上九天,或如处子默而无言停泊家港。攀山者和念家者不约而同地说出那句“我愿意”,都是如此坚定。

何者?从其本心而已。

在你我的本心中,潜藏着许多。若情感:儿女之情,手足之情,家国之情,故有冲关一怒,双肋插刀,愤而投笔,血荐轩辕。

违背本心的情感,有手足相残,同室操戈者,登临金字塔高点,数不尽妒忌与艳羡,万人簇拥过后,惟有孤独的长眠。背叛本心的人,本心会给予他双倍的失落与孤独。

反之,若清末举人汪笑侬,风雨飘摇,江山寥落,他竟弃文从戏。所谓倡优并举,意在写京剧艺人的身份地位低下如妓女,汪不顾鄙夷谩骂,不顾练戏之艰,以时政入京剧,开创新剧,意在以这种古老的方式唤醒国民。在他名动天下,嘉奖如纸片发来之时,他那颗早已经受风霜拷问的心在愿景实现后该是如何的欢欣与满足,家国之情,不正是本心吗?

指路灯,登天索,领航舵——那是你我本心中的理想。请听从本心理想的召唤,扬帆远航吧。因为没有会比这个让你更坚定,更愿意为之奋斗。

年轻是珍宝,但社会嘈杂的音乐,迷醉的灯光遮蔽了本心的投影,所以迷茫,挥霍青春。半途而废,中道易辙者大多在此时一声叹息,掉头或干脆坐在地上。

是时候寻找自己那份本心的理想了。香茗,可饮;禅理,可寻;瓦尔登湖,可游;浩渺星空,可览。但这都是手段,真正需要做的是问自己:“最愿意的是什么?”找到它,并为之奋斗。

然而,以上观点建立于亚圣先生的石基——人性本善之上,即你我之本心虽千变万化,仍为善心。追求公正,倡导和谐,弘扬大爱等等。若有人言贪嗔痴,杀伐,虚假等才是其本心,在下不敢苟同。

愿持本心之情感,以无悔对待家人,无愧面对国家;愿持本心之理想,以无惧实现追求,以无畏逐梦人生。

以屈子之诗与诸君共勉:亦余心之所善兮,虽九死其犹未悔。

题目分析:这是一则材料作文,材料正合乎新课标的作文立意,简单明了,不难为学生,注意材料中的提示“我为什么要故作谦恭呢?与其推来让去,不如按照自己的本意,简单地处理事情岂不更好”和后面的话语“高僧点头称赞”,这正体现命题人的意图。最佳立意角度:不作虚假的谦恭(谦让),要按照本意简单处事。其他立意角度:①不作虚假的谦恭(谦让);②做人应实诚; ③学会理解与包容。等等。

单项选择题
单项选择题

Immigrants are consumers as well as producers, so they create jobs as well as taking them. And the work they do need not be at the expense of native workers. Immigrants often hold jobs that natives are unwilling to accept at any feasible wage.

Also, immigrants sometimes help to keep industries viable (能存活的) that would otherwise disappear altogether, causing employment to fall. This was the conclusion of a study of the Los Angeles garment industry in the 1970s and 1980s. And when immigrants working for low wages do put downward pressure on natives’ wages, they may raise the (real) wages of natives in general by keeping prices lower than they otherwise would be.

In theory, then, the net effect of immigration on native wages is uncertain. Unfortunately, most of the empirical (经验主义的) research on whether immigrants make natives worse off in practice is also inconclusive except the effect, one way or the other, seems small. Most of this research has been done in America: if there were any marked influence on wages, that is where you would expect to find it, given the scale of immigration and the tendency of the newcomers to concentrate in certain areas. But most studies have compared wages and employment in areas with many immigrants to wages and employment in areas with few. For instance, one examined the impact of sudden and notorious inflow of refugees to Miami from the Cuban port of Mariel in 1980. Within the space of a few months, 125000 people had arrived, increasing Miami’s labor force by 7%. Yet the study concluded that wages and employment among the city’s natives, including the unskilled, were virtually unaffected. Another study examined the effect of immigration on wages and employment of those at the bottom of the jobs ladder-unskilled blacks and Hispanics. It found that a doubling of the rate of immigration had no detectable effect on natives.

The most recent work, admittedly, has tended to question these findings. Using more detailed statistics and more sophisticated methods than the earlier studies, this work has tended to find that immigrants’ wages take longer to rise to the level of the natives’ wages than has been supposed. This implies a more persistent downward pressure on the host economy’s labor market.

Typically these studies find that immigration does depress unskilled natives’ wages to a small extent. But nearly all economists would agree that the effects of immigration are insignificant in relation to other influences.

According to the most recent study, ().

A. immigration only depresses unskilled natives’ wages to a large extent

B. immigration puts a longer downward pressure on the natives’ wages

C. immigrants’ wages can rise to the level of natives’ very quickly

D. immigrants tend to be in unemployment for a long time