问题 辨析题

南北极地区有很多问题迷惑着小明和小华,下面是两人在几个问题上的观点及其理由,请你对他们的观点进行评价,并说明你的理由。

问题一:关于南极、北极哪个更冷?

小明的观点:北极更冷,因为北冰洋处于高纬地区,一年之中受到的太阳光热最少。

小华的观点:南极更冷,因为南极地区一年中受到的太阳光热最少,南极地势高,冰层巨厚,气温更低,是世界寒极。

问题二:关于南极地区有丰富煤炭资源的猜想。

小明的观点:南极洲原先并不在现在的位置,而是从温带或热带地区飘移过来的,那时,这片大陆上有大片的森林,后来形成了煤层。

小华的观点:南极洲的位置并没有变化,只是原先的气温并不是这样低,曾有茂密的森林,形成煤层,只是后来不明原因,气温降到现在的情况。

问题三:关于南极最佳的考察时间。

小明的观点:盛夏7月,气温最高,最适宜在南极考察。

小华的观点:每年2月份左右,是南极的暖季,最适宜考察。

评析:

___________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

答案

可能一对一错,也可能都不全面,要求言之成理,正确理解。

问答题 简答题
单项选择题

Walking through my train yesterday, staggering from my seat to the buffet and back, I counted five people reading Harry Potter novels. Not children-these were real grown-ups reading children’s books,
Maybe that would have been understandable. If these people had jumped whole-heartedly into a second childhood it would have made more sense. But they were card-carrying grown-ups with laptops and spreadsheets returning from sales meetings and seminars. Yet they chose to read a children’s book.
I don’t imagine you’ll find this headcount exceptional. You can no longer get on the London Tube and not see a Harry Potter book. Nor is it just the film; these throwback readers were out there in droves long before the movie campaign opened.
So who are these adult readers who have made JK Rowling the second-biggest female earner in Britain (after Madonna) As I have tramped along streets knee-deep in Harry Potter paperbacks, I’ve mentally slotted them into three groups.
First come the Never-Readers, whom Harry has enticed into opening a book. Is this a bad thing Probably not. Writing has many advantages over film, but it can never compete with its magnetic punch. If these books can re-establish the novel as a thrilling experience for some people, then this can only be for the better. If it takes obsession-level hype to lure them into a bookshop. that’s fine by me. But will they go on to read anything else Again, we can only hope.
The second group are the Occasional Readers. These people claim that tiredness, work and children allow them to read only a few books a year. Yet now—to be part of the crowd, to say they’ve read it—they put Harry Potter on their oh-so-select reading list. It’s infuriating, and maddening. Yes, I’m a writer myself, currently writing difficult, unreadable, hopefully unsettling novels, but there are so many other good books out there, so much rewarding, enlightening, enlarging works of fiction for adults; and yet these sad cases are swept along by the hype, the faddism, into reading a children’s book.
The third group are the Regular Readers, for whom Harry is sandwiched between McEwan (英国当代作家) and Balzac, Roth (德国现代诗人) and Dickens. This is the real baffler—what on earth do they get out of reading it Why bother But if they call rattle through it in a week just to say they ve been there—like going to Longleat (朗利特山庄英国名胜) or the Eiffel Tower—the worst they’re doing is encouraging others.

The word "it" underlined in Paragraph 5 refers to ______.

A.writing

B.film

C.the novel

D.book