问题 选择题

从北京去南极考察的科考队什么时间出发最好(  )

A.3月1日

B.5月1日

C.6月1日

D.12月1日

答案

我国在南极洲建有长城站、中山站和昆仑站三个科学考察站.通常在那里进行科学考察的最佳时间为12月-次年2月,因为此时为该地区的暖季,又是极昼时期,便于科考.故选项D符合题意.

故选:D.

多项选择题


每题所给的选项中有一个或一个以上正确答案。

下面说法正确的是:( )

A.申某系某市卫生局的副局长,樊某系某市看守所工作人员,樊某之妻系该市卫生局的一名科长,因申某对樊某之妻“不够好”,后申某因涉嫌受贿被羁押在该市看守所。樊某在其当班期间曾对申某施以虐待行为。一日,为更全面了解案件详情,增加诉讼时的控诉力度,樊某利用职权对申某大打出手,令其交代有罪的供述,致申某重伤。根据有关规定,对于樊某侵犯人身权利的行为,应当由公安机关立案侦查

B.唐某因故意杀人罪被判无期徒刑,在位于某市某区的某省第一监狱服刑。在服刑期内,他苦思冥想,挖掘地道,费尽心机终于抓住一个机会成功逃至某县。但因身无分文,遂持刀抢劫过路行人,老少妇孺皆不放过。脱逃后六日被抓捕回该监狱,在对脱逃罪讯问过程中,发现了唐某在某县抢劫的情况。则他应当由某区人民检察院将其抢劫罪和脱逃罪一并起诉处理

C.某市中级人民法院不能审判该市某区人民法院管辖的第一刑事案件;某市某区人民法院也无权审理该市中级人民法院管辖的第一审刑事案件

D.王某系某矿业有限公司副总,按照法律规定和该公司性质,王某应届非国家机关工作人员之列,工某为取得保护,数次向某市副市长行贿,总数达,300余万元。对其涉嫌行贿罪的行为,依法属于人民检察院立案侦查的范围

单项选择题

My Views on Gambling
Most of life is a gamble. Very many of the things we do involve taking some risk in order to achieve a satisfactory result. We undertake a new job with no idea of the more indirect consequences of our action. Marriage is certainly a gamble and so is the bringing into existence of children, who could prove sad liabilities. A journey, a business transaction, even a chance remark may result immediately or ultimately in tragedy. Perpetually we gamble-against life, destiny, chance, the unknown, call the invisible opponent what we will. Human survival and progress indicate that usually we win.
So the gambling instinct must be an elemental one. Taking risks to achieve something is a characteristic of all forms of life, including humanity. As soon as man acquired property, the challenge he habitually issued to destiny found an additional expression in a human contest. Early may well have staked his flint axe, his bearskin, his wife, in the hope of adding to his possessions. The acquirement of desirable but nonessential commodities must have increased his scope enormously, while the risk of complete disaster lessened.
So long as man was gambling against destiny, the odds were usually in his favor, especially when he used commonsense. But as the methods of gambling multiplied, the chances of success decreased. A wager against one person offered on average even chances and no third party profited by the transaction. But as soon as commercialized city life developed, mass gambling become common. Thousands of people now compete for large prizes, but with only minute chances of success, while the organizers of gambling concerns enjoy big profits with, in some cases, no risk at all. Few clients of the betting shops, football pools, state lotteries, bingo sessions, even charity raffles, realize fully the flimsiness of their chances and the fact that without fantastic luck they are certain to lose rather than gain.
Little irreparable harm results for the normal individual. That big business profits from the satisfaction of a human instinct is a common enough phenomenon. The average wage-earner, who leads a colorless existence, devotes a small percentage of his earnings to keeping alive with extraordinary constancy the dream of achieving some magic change in his life. Gambling is in most cases a non-toxic drug against boredom and apathy and may well preserve good temper, patience and optimism in dreary circumstances. A sudden windfall may unbalance a weaker, less intelligent person and even ruin his life. And the line of something for nothing as an ideal evokes criticism from the more rigidly upright representatives of the community. But few of us have the right to condemn as few of us can say we never gamble-even it is only investing a few pence a week in the firm’s football sweep or the church bazaar "lucky dip."
Trouble develops, however, when any human instinct or appetite becomes overdeveloped. Moderate drinking produces few harmful effects but drunkenness and alcoholism can have terrible consequences. With an unlucky combination of temperament and circumstances, gambling can only become an obsession, almost a form of insanity, resulting in the loss not only of a man’s property but of his self-respect and his conscience. Far worse are the sufferings of his dependants, deprived of material comfort and condemned to watching his deterioration and hopelessness. They share none of his feverish excitement or the exhilaration of his rare success. The fact that he does not wish to be cured makes psychological treatment of the gambling addict almost impossible. He will use any means, including stealing, to enable him to carry on. It might be possible to pay what salary he can earn to his wife for the family maintenance but this is clearly no solution. Nothing-education, home environment, other interest, wise discouragement-is likely to restrain the obsessed gambler and even when it is he alone who suffers the consequences, his disease is a cruel one, resulting in a wasted, unhappy life.
Even in the case of the more physically harmful of human indulgences, repressive legislation often merely increases the damage by causing more vicious activities designed to perpetuate the indulgence in secret. On the whole, though negative, gambling is no vice within reasonable limits. It would still exist in an ideal society. The most we can hope for is control over exaggerated profits resulting from its business exploitation, far more attention and research devoted to the unhappy gambling addict and the type of education which will encourage an interest in so many other constructive activities that gambling itself will lose its fascination as an opiate to a dreary existence. It could be regarded as an occasional mildly exciting game, never to be taken very seriously.

According to the author, we gamble regardless of the risk because we

A.want to survive.

B.usually win in the gamble.

C.don’t know the indirect consequences of the action.

D.wish to achieve what may bring us satisfaction.