刘某在倒卖假烟时被镇工商行政管理所查获，该所依法将刘某尚未卖出的假烟和运送假烟的汽车扣押。刘某当晚携带尖刀等工具翻墙进入该所院内，意图把被扣押的车夺回。因大门上锁无法将汽车开走，刘某便拿出斧头、手电直奔所长办公室劫夺大门钥匙。值班的副所长被惊醒，当即起身。刘持斧威胁：“别动，趴下，把脸蒙上”。该副所长趁机抓起被子照刘某捂去，刘某挥斧砍去，砍破被子，并砍在办公桌上。副所长边与刘某搏斗边呼喊，刘某见势不好，下楼逃跑。刘某的行为构成( )。

A．抢劫罪(未遂)

B．抢夺罪(未遂)

C．盗窃罪(未遂)

D．不构成犯罪

Read the argument and the instructions that follow it, and then make any notes that will help you plan your response. Write your response on a separate sheet of paper. If possible, type your essay on a word processor. Observe the 30-minute time limit.
The following letter was printed in a medical journal:
Many nonprescription drugs can cause serious side effects, particularly when taken in conjunction with other drugs or in large quantities. If these potentially harmful nonprescription drugs were sold only by prescription, then a doctor or pharmacist would be able to explain the possible side effects of the drug and would also be able to monitor the quantity of the drug purchased, thereby decreasing the chance that a person would take too much of the drug. Therefore, any drug with potentially serious side effects should be sold only by prescription.
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion, be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative examples or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.