问题 综合题

阅读下列材料:

材料一:美国及其他联合国家承认,目前中华民国政府为中国唯一的合法政府,为达到统一中国目标之恰当机构。……自治性的军队例如 * * 党军队那样的存在,及与中国政治团结不相符合,且实际上使政治团结不能实现。

——《杜鲁门关于美国对华政策的声明》(1945年12月)

材料二:据许多观察家的意见,他们(指国民党政府)已经堕落于腐败,争夺地位权力,……一向是一党政府,而不是在西方寓义下之民主政府。……尽管如此,我们为了显见的理由,仍然继续全力援助国民政府。

——《艾奇逊致杜鲁门的信》(1947年7月)

回答:

①根据材料,结合所学知识,指出二战后初期美国对华的基本政策。

②根据材料二,概括当时西方“观察家”眼中的国民党政府形象。

③艾奇逊写这封信的时候,中国的政治局势如何?他所谓的“显见的理由”是什么?

答案

①扶蒋 * *

②政治腐败(争夺权力); * * (独裁)

③人民解放战争即将取得全国胜利(国民党统治已被推翻)。阻止中 * * 党在全国取得 * * ,尽力维护美国在华利益。

第①问要求学生回答抗战胜利后美国对华基本政策,根据所学知识,可直接答出,但我们也应了解二战后美国企图称霸世界的野心,而控制中国是美国全球战略的重要组成部分。美国在中国妄图建立一个稳定统一的亲美 * * 政府。为此,它就必须首先“阻止 * * 党安全控制中国”,维护美国在华利益。第②问根据材料和所学知识不难回答,第③问可根据艾奇逊写信时间(1947年7月)来推断。

选择题
阅读理解

How do you design a pay plan that motivates people to do their best work? A new study by three Harvard researchers suggests a novel answer: Shortly after you hire new workers, give them a raise.

"Previous research has shown that paying people more than they expect may elicit reciprocity(相互作用) in the form of greater productivity," notes Deepak Malhotra, a Harvard business-administration professor who worked on the study. What he and his colleagues found, however, was that the connection between more pay and extra effort depends on presenting the increase "as a gift—that is, as something you've chosen to do purely as a nice gesture, with no strings attached."

Malhotra and his team studied 267 people hired by oDesk, a global online network of freelancers, to do a one-time data-entry project for four hours. All of the new hires were people in developing countries, for whom hourly wages of $3 and $4 were higher than what they had been making in previous jobs.

The researchers split the group up into three equal parts. One group was told they would earn $3 an hour. A second group was initially hired at $3 an hour but, before they started working, they got a surprise: The budget for the project had expanded unexpectedly, they were told, and they would now be paid $4 an hour. The third group was offered $4 an hour from the start and given no increase.

Even though the second and third groups were eventually paid the same amount, the second group worked harder and produced more—about 20% more—than either of the other two. People in the second group also showed the most stamina, maintaining their focus all the way through the assigned task and performing especially well toward the end of the four hours. Interestingly, the more experienced employees in the high-performing group were the most productive of all, apparently because their previous work experience led them to appreciate the rarity of an unexpected raise.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, Malhotra points out that higher pay, in and of itself, didn't promote productivity: People who made $4 an hour from the beginning worked no harder than those who were hired at $3 and were then paid $3.

To get the most impact from their pay plans, he adds, companies might consider not only what to pay new hires, but when to pay it.

"The key thing is how you present [the reason for an increase]," he says. Doling out extra money could promote productivity most "if you make it clear that the pay raise is something you're choosing to do just because you can. Our theory is that people will reciprocate. If you do something nice, they'll do something nice back."   

小题1:Which of the following is true about the research?

A.None of the participants earned more than $4 an hour in previous jobs.

B.89 of the participants got a $1 wage raise for their high productivity.

C.It was so important that the budget for it was increased in the process.

D.Stamina shown in it was positively related to the amount of money paid.小题2:What does the underlined word “stamina” most probably mean?

A.The quality of being intelligent or clever.

B.The quality of doing something difficult or dangerous.

C.The physical or mental energy needed to do a tiring activity for a long time.

D.A particular method of doing an activity, usually involving practical skills.小题3:Why did the second group produce more than the other two groups?

A.Because they thought they were better paid than the other groups.

B.Because they were experienced employees from developing countries.

C.Because an unexpected raise reminded them of their previous work.

D.Because they felt they were nicely treated and tried best to repay it.小题4:What can we infer from this passage?

A.No pains, no gains.

B.It matters not what we give but how.

C.Honesty is the best policy.

D.Actions speak louder than words.