问题 选择题

—Do you have any plans for your summer vacation?
—I am _____ for London next Sunday.


A. going to
B. leaving
C. will go
D. will leave
答案

答案:B

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面语段,完成文后各题。

梅圣俞诗集·序

予闻世谓诗人少达而多穷,夫岂然哉?盖世所传诗者,多出于古穷人之辞也。凡士之蕴其所有,而不得施于世者,多喜自放于山巅水涯之外,见虫鱼草木风云鸟兽之状类,往往探其奇怪。内有忧思感愤之郁积,其兴于怨刺,以道羁臣寡妇之所叹,而写人情之难言,盖愈穷则愈工。然则非诗之能穷人,殆穷者而后工也。

予友梅圣俞,少以荫补为吏,累举进士,辄抑于有司。困于州县,凡十余年。年今五十,犹从辟书,为人之佐。郁其所蓄,不得奋见于事业。其家宛陵,幼习于诗,自为童子,出语已惊其长老。既长,学乎六经仁义之说,其为文章,简古纯粹,不求苟说于世,世之人徒知其诗而已。然时无贤愚,语诗者必求之圣俞。圣俞亦自以其不得志者,乐于诗而发之。故其平生所作,于诗尤多。世既知之矣,而未有荐于上者。昔王文康公尝见而叹曰:“二百年无此作矣!虽知之深,亦不果荐也。若使其幸得用于朝廷,作为雅、颂,以歌咏大宋之功德,荐之清庙,而追商、周、鲁颂之作者,岂不伟欤!奈何使其老不得志,而为穷者之诗,乃徒发于虫鱼物类羁愁感叹之言。世徒喜其工,不知其穷之久而将老也,可不惜哉!

圣俞诗既多,不自收拾。其妻之兄子谢景初,惧其多而易失也,取其自洛阳至于吴兴以来所作,次为十卷。予尝嗜圣俞诗,而患不能尽得之,遽喜谢氏之能类次也,辄序而藏之。

其后十五年,圣俞以疾卒于京师,余既哭而铭之,因索于其家,得其遗稿千余篇,并旧所藏,掇其尤者六百七十七篇,为一十五卷。呜呼!吾于圣俞诗论之详矣,故不复云。

庐陵欧阳修序。

                            (选自《欧阳文忠公文集》)

【注】①梅尧臣:字圣俞,北宋诗人。少年举进士不第,仁宗时赐进士出身,多任小吏,仕途上不得志。②荫yìn补:子孙因前辈功勋而得官为荫,官吏或缺被选充职为补。梅尧臣26岁时因叔父梅询荫补为太庙斋郎。③王文康公:王曙,宋仁宗时宰相。

9、对下列句子中加点词的解释,不正确的一项是                       (     )

A、而写人情之难言  人情:人的情感。

B、辄抑于有司,困于州县  有司:官吏的通称。

C、以歌咏大宋之功德  歌咏:歌颂、颂扬。

D、多出于古穷人之辞也  穷人:生活穷苦的人。

10、下列各组句子中,加点词的意义和用法不相同的一组是               (     )

A、其兴于怨刺,以道羁臣寡妇之所叹         得璧,传之美人,以戏弄臣

B、殆穷者而后工也                          郦元之所见闻,殆与余同

C、不得奋见于事业                          天下之欲疾其君者皆欲赴愬于王

D、吾于圣俞诗论之详矣                      世言晋王之将终也   

11、以下六句话,分别编为四组,全都说明梅圣俞“穷”的原因的一组是    (    )

①累举进士,辄抑于有司,困于州县       ②年今五十,犹从辟书,为人之佐

③其为文章,简古纯粹,不求苟说于世     ④圣俞亦自以其不得志者,乐于诗而发之

⑤世既知之矣,而未有荐于上者           ⑥世徒喜其工,不知其穷之久而将老也

A、①③⑤  B、①⑤⑥    C、②③⑥   D、②④⑤ 

12、下列对原文有关内容的分析和概括不正确的一项是                    (    )

A 、作者认为世上所流传的诗歌,大多出于困厄之士的笔下,他们不能充分施展自己的才智,就把内心郁积的忧愁感慨转化为诗兴,写出人所难于言传的感受。

B、梅圣俞孩童时就已使长辈惊异于他的诗歌才华,等到长大,学习了六经仁义的学问,写的文章简古纯正,但他不愿意随便向世人表白,因此世人只知道他会写诗。

C、王文康曾高度评价梅圣俞的诗歌,感叹已经二百年没有这样的杰作,这话从侧面印证了梅圣俞诗歌的工巧。

D、文章没有把论述梅圣俞的诗歌艺术当作主要内容,而是借诗序的形式,表达了对梅圣俞虽才智超群却未能“得用于朝廷”的惋惜和悲叹。

13、把上文中画横线的句子翻译成现代汉语(10分)

(1)奈何使其老不得志,而为穷者之诗,乃徒发于虫鱼物类羁愁感叹之言。(4分)

                                                                         

(2)予尝嗜圣俞诗,而患不能尽得之,遽喜谢氏之能类次也,辄序而藏之。(4分)

                                                                        

(3)圣俞亦自以其不得志者,乐于诗而发之。(2分)

                                                                           

单项选择题

Questions 84-90 are based on the following passage.
Imagine a society in which cash no longer exists. Instead "cash" is electronic, as in bankcard systems. Currency and coin are abandoned. The immediate benefits would be profound and fundamental. Theft of cash would become impossible. Bank robberies and cash-register robberies would simply cease to occur. Attacks on shopkeepers, taxi drivers, and cashiers would all end. Purse snatchings would become a thing of the past. Urban streets would become safer. Retail shops in once-dangerous areas could operate in safety. Security costs and insurance rates would fall. Property values would rise. Neighborhoods would improve.
Drug traffickers and their clients, burglars and receivers of stolen property, arsonists for hire, and bribe-takers would no longer have the advantage of using untraceable currency. Electronic "money" would leave incriminating wails of data, resulting in more arrests and convictions. These prosecutions, in turn, would inhibit further crimes.
The impact of the monetary change on underground economies would be nearly as dramatic as the effect on crime. In the United States, the underground economy is estimated at between 10% and 28% of the gross national product. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) researches suggest that almost all hidden labor is paid in currency.
In a society devoid of physical money, a change from cash to recorded electronic money would be accompanied by a flow of previously unpaid income-tax revenues running in the tens of billions of dollars. As a result, income-tax rates could be lowered and the national debt reduced.
Cash has been the root of much social and economic evil. The emergence of electronic funds-transfer technology makes it possible to change the nature of money and to divorce it from evil. Eighty percent of Americans regularly use credit cards. The development of a federal system to handle the country’ s 300 billion annual cash transactions in the United States electronically is within reach.
A national electronic-money system would operate as debit-card system. Each individual’s "money" would be held in his money-system account. A transaction would effect an instant transfer of "money" from his account to that of another account holder.
The principal differences between a national electronic-money system and commercial bank-card systems would be: the money system would be federally operated; payment would constitute "legal tender"; system-account holders would be able to receive as well as pay out funds by use of their accounts; and funds would be transferable between private-account holders as well as between merchants and private-account holders.
Only cash would be supplanted by electronic money. The use of checks, drafts, money orders, traveler’s checks, cashier’s checks, as well as letters of credit, acceptances, and other financial instruments would remain in regular use. Credit card and automatic-teller-machine systems (ATMs) would not necessarily change, although you could no longer obtain cash at ATMs.

"Hidden labor" in this passage refers to labor that is paid in ______.

A.electronic money

B.money that is hard to count

C.after-tax money

D.money that is untaxed