问题 阅读理解

                               Visit Forest Zoo
Come and see the Indian elephants and the new tigers from Northeast of China. The beautiful birds from England are ready to sing songs for you, and the monkeys from Mount Emei will be happy to talk to you. The lovely dogs from Australia want to laugh at you. Sichuan pandas will play balls for you. The giraffes from Africa are waiting to look down on you.
Tickets                                Opening time:
Grown-up (成人): ¥3                    9:00 a.m.--- 4:00 p.m.
Children: Over(高于)1.4m: ¥2          except(除了) Friday:
Under1.4m:  Free              10:00 a.m. ---- 3:00 p.m.
Keep the zoo clean!
Do not touch(触摸), give food or go near to the animals.
小题1:How many kinds of animals are there in the zoo?
A Six.    B. Seven.   C. Eight.     D. Four.
小题2:How much does Mr. Smith have to pay if he visit the zoo with his son who is 1.45m?
A.4.B.5.C.7.D.6.
小题3:Can we visit the zoo at 9:30 a.m. on Friday?
A.No, we can’t.B.Yes, we can.C.If we pay, we can.D.We don’t know.
小题4:Which of the following is wrong?
A.We can hear the songs from English beautiful birds.
B.We can’t give the food to the animals to keep the zoo clean.
C.We can go to the zoo at 1:00 p.m. on Sunday.
D.We can touch the animals to show that we are friendly to them.
小题5:What is the passage?
A.A notice(通知).
B.A post(海报) from the zoo.
C.A result of an animal survey.
D.An essay(论说文).
答案

小题1:B

小题2:B

小题3:A

小题4:D

小题5:B

小题1:根据文章内容大意可知答案为B

小题2:根据文章内容Grown-up (成人): ¥3                    9:00 a.m.--- 4:00 p.m.Children: Over(高于)1.4m: ¥2 可知答案为B

小题3:根据文章内容Opening time:

Grown-up (成人): ¥3                    9:00 a.m.--- 4:00 p.m.

Children: Over(高于)1.4m: ¥2          except(除了) Friday:

Under1.4m:  Free              10:00 a.m. ---- 3:00可知答案为A

小题4:根据文章内容大意可知答案为D

小题5:根据文章内容大意可知答案为B

单项选择题
填空题

Do mobile phones cause explosions at petrol stations That question has just been exhaustively answered by Adam Burgess, a researcher at the University of Kent, in England. Oddly, however, Dr Burgess is not a physicist, but a sociologist. For the concern rests not on scientific evidence of any danger, but is instead the result of sociological factors: it is an urban myth, supported and propagated by official sources, but no less a myth for that. Dr Burgess presented his findings this week at the annual conference of the British Sociological Association.

Mobile phones started to become widespread in the late 1980s, when the oil industry was in the middle of a concerted safety drive, Dr Burgess notes. This was, in large part. a response to the Piper Alpha disaster in 1988, when 167 people died in an explosion on an oil platform off the Scottish coast. (41)__________So nobody questioned the precautionary ban on the use of mobile phones at petrol stations. The worry was that an electrical spark might ignite explosive fumes.

(42)__________But it was too late. The myth had taken hold.

One problem, says Dr Burgess, is that the number of petrol-station fires increased in the late 1990s, just as mobile phones were proliferating. Richard Coates, BP’s fire-safety adviser, investigated many of the 243 such fires that occurred around the world between 1993 and 2004. He concluded that most were indeed caused by sparks igniting petrol vapour, but the sparks themselves were the result of static electricity, not electrical equipment. Most drivers will have experienced a mild electric shock when climbing out of their vehicles. It is caused by friction between driver and seat, with the result that both end up electrically charged. When the driver touches the metal frame of the vehicle, the result is sometimes a spark. ( 43 )__________

(44)__________One e-mail contained fictitious examples of such explosions said to have happened in Indonesia and Australia. Another, supposedly sent out by Shell, found its way on to an internal website at Exxon, says Dr Burgess, where it was treated as authoritative by employees. Such memos generally explain static fires quite accurately, but mistakenly attribute them to mobile phones. Official denials, says Dr Burgess, simply inflame the suspicions of conspiracy theorists.

(45)__________Warning signs abound in Britain, America, Canada and Australia. The city of Sao Paulo, in Brazil, introduced a ban last year. And, earlier this month, a member of Connecticut’s senate proposed making the use of mobile phones in petrol stations in that state punishable by a $ 250 fine.

[A] The safety drive did not apply merely to offshore operations: employees at some British oil-company offices are now required to use handrails while walking up and down stairs, for example.

[B] As a result, the company had to pay a huge amount of compensation to the families of the victims and law suits concerning those fires seemed to be endless.

[C] A further complication was the rise of the internet, where hoax memos, many claiming to originate from oil companies, warned of the danger of using mobile phones in petrol stations.

[D] This is particularly noticeable in Britain. The country that led the way in banning mobile phones at petrol stations is also the country that has taken the pest line on the safety of mobile-phone use by children.

[E] Despite the lack of evidence that mobile phones can cause explosions, bans remain in place around the world, though the rules vary widely.

[F] By tile late 1990s, however, phone makers—having conducted their own research— realized that there was no danger of phones causing explosions since they could not generate the required sparks.

[G] This seems to have become more common as plastic car interiors, synthetic garments and rubber-soled shoes have proliferated.

41()