问题 默写题

古诗文名句填空。(8分)

小题1:今夜偏知春气暖,            。

小题2:且壮士不死即已,死即举大名耳,                 

小题3:古代诗歌中,有一类诗句全部以名词组合而成,展现了情景交融的美妙境界,如温庭筠《商山早行》中的“          ,人迹板桥霜”;马致远《天净沙﹒秋思》中的“枯藤老树昏鸦,         ”。

小题4:在默写古诗词名句时,有时同学不能正确区别“雁”与“燕”而出现误写。其实,这两种形象在古诗词中表达的情感是不同的,“雁”一般与思乡有关,如                            。而“燕”一般则与报春有关,如               ,               。

答案

小题1:虫声新透绿窗纱

小题2:王侯将相宁有种乎

小题3:鸡声茅店月;小桥流水人家

小题4:如:乡书何处达,归雁洛阳边;不落雁南渡,北风江上寒;几处早莺争暖树,谁家新燕啄春泥;燕子来时新社,梨花落后清明。

题目分析:填写古诗易写错别字,原因是在背诵古诗是只注意读音,不仔细看字,结果在填写时就按音写成其它的同音字,学习时要注意这个问题。比如本题要注意的易错字有:纱、侯、乎、茅,要根据句子的语境判断汉字,是形声字,从形旁声旁来判断正确的写法。

单项选择题

Large parts of the world have not enjoyed the remarkable global progress in health conditions that have taken place over the past century. Indeed, millions of deaths in impoverished nations are avoidable with prevention and treatment options that the rich world already uses. This year, 10 million children will die in low and middle income countries. If child death rates were the same as those in developed countries this figure would be lower than 1 million. Conversely, if child death rates were those of rich countries just 100 years ago, the figure would be 30 million. Today’s tools for improving health are so powerful and inexpensive that health conditions could be reasonably good even in poor countries if policy makers spent even relatively little in the right places.

Recent research for the Copenhagen Consensus identifies several highly cost-effective options that would tackle some of the planet’s most urgent health problems. The most promising investment is in tuberculosis treatment. Some 90 percent of the 1.6 million tuberculosis deaths in 2003 occurred in low-and middle-income countries. Because tuberculosis affects working-age people, it can be a trigger of household poverty. The cornerstone of control is prompt treatment using first-line drugs, which doesn’t require a sophisticated health system. Spending $1 billion on tuberculosis treatment in a year would save 1 million lives. Because good health accompanies higher levels of national economic welfare in the long run, the economic benefits are worth $ 30 billion.

The second most cost-effective investment is tackling heart disease. Heart disease might not seem like a pressing issue for poor nations, but it represents more than a quarter of their death toll. Measures to reduce risk factors other than smoking — high intake or saturated animal fat, obesity, binge drinking of. alcohol, physical inactivity, and low fruit and vegetable consumption — have had little success. Treating acute heart attacks with inexpensive drugs is, however, cost-effective. Spending $ 200 million could avert several hundred thousand deaths, yielding benefits that are 25 times higher than costs.

The third option is prevention and treatment of malaria. A billion dollars would expand the provision of insecticide-treated bed-nets and facilitate provision of highly effective treatment. This would save more than a million child deaths and produce economic benefits worth $ 20 billion.

The fourth alternative for policymakers is to focus on child health initiatives. The best measures are familiar ones expanding immunization coverage, promoting breastfeeding, increasing the use of simple and cheap treatments for diarrhea and childhood pneumonia, and so on.

Even if the costs of all these initiatives were two or three times higher than we estimate, these efforts would still provide amazing opportunities to reduce health inequality and do good in the world.

The most effective investment is in the treatment for().

A.tuberculosis

B.heart disease

C.malaria

D.diarrhea

单项选择题