问题 单项选择题

下列情形中用人单位不可以单方面解除劳动合同的是:( )。

A.职工李某被人民法院判有期徒刑2年但缓期执行

B.女职工王某因严重失职给单位造成重大损失,但她尚在怀孕期间

C.职工钱某因工负伤且部分丧失劳动能力,医疗期结束后不能从事原工作也不能从事由用人单位另行安排的工作

D.公司生产经营状况发生严重困难不得不裁员,公司决定与尚在试用期的赵某解除劳动合同

答案

参考答案:C

解析:[考点] 用人单位单方面解决劳动合同的情形
《劳动法》第25、26、27、29条就用人单位可以单方面解除劳动合同的情形进行了正反两方面的规定。特别要注意第25、26、27条与第29条之间的关系。即有第29条的情形的情况下,用人单位不可因第26、27条的情形而解除劳动合同。只要符合第25条的情况,即使有第 29条的情形,用人单位也可以解除劳动合同。A项属于劳动者被追究刑事责任的情况,用人单位可以解除劳动合同。B项属于第25条规定的情形,故不论是否在怀孕期间均可以解除劳动合同。 C项属于第29条规定的因工负伤丧失劳动能力的情形,用人单位不可以解除劳动合同。D项属于第27条规定的经济性裁员,不论职工是否在试用期用人单位都可以单方面解决劳动合同。

多项选择题
问答题

The potential of computers for increasing the control of organizations or society over their members and for invading the privacy of those members has caused considerable concern.
The privacy issue has been raised most insistently with respect to the creation and maintenance of data files that assemble information about persons from a multitude of sources. Files of this kind would be highly valuable for many kinds of economic and social research, but they are bought at too high a price if they endanger human freedom or seriously enhance the opportunities of blackmailers. (2) While such dangers should not be ignored, it should be noted that the lack of comprehensive data files has never before been the limiting barrier to the suppression of human freedom.
Making the computer the villain in the invasion of privacy or encroachment on civil liberties simply diverts attention from the real dangers. Computer data banks can and must be given the highest degree of protection from abuse. (3) But we must be careful, also, that we do not employ such crude methods of protection as to deprive our society of important data it needs to understand its own social processes and to analyze its problems.
Perhaps the most important question of all about the computer is what it has done and will do to man’s view of himself and his place in the universe. (4) The most heated attacks on the computer are not focused on its possible economic effects, its presumed destruction of job satisfaction, or its threat to privacy and liberty, but upon the claim that it causes people to be viewed, and to view themselves, as ’machines’.
What the computer and the progress in artificial intelligence challenge is an ethic that rests on man’s apartness from the rest of nature. An alternative ethic, of course, views man as a part of nature, governed by natural law, subject to the forces of gravity and the demands of his body. (5) The debate about artificial intelligence and the simulation of man’s thinking is, in considerable part, a confrontation of these two views of man’s place in the universe.