问题 阅读理解

阅读下面两篇短文,根据短文内容,选择最佳选项。

     A 10-year-old boy decided to study judo (柔道), although he had lost his left arm in a car accident.

     The boy began lessons with an old Japanese judo teacher, Mr. Tanaka. The boy was doing well, but

his teacher had taught him only one move in three months of training.

     "Mr. Tanaka," the boy finally asked, "shouldn't I be learning more moves?"

     "This is the only move you know, but this is the only move you'll ever need to know," his teacher

replied.

     Several months later, Mr. Tanaka took the boy to his first tournament (锦标赛). The boy won his

first three matches, using his one move to win. The boy was now in the finals, and was amazed by his

own success.

     This time, his opponent (对手) was bigger, stronger, and more experienced. The referee (裁判)

wanted to stop the match.

     "No," the teacher insisted, "let him continue." Soon, his opponent lowered his guard. At that moment

the boy used his move to pin (钉住) him. The boy won the match and became the champion.

     On the way home, the boy and his teacher reviewed every match. Then the boy asked what was

really in his mind.

     "Mr. Tanaka, how did I win the tournament with only one move?"

     "You won for two reasons," his teacher answered. "First, you've almost mastered one of the most

difficult throws in all of judo. And second, the only defense (防守) for that move is for your opponent to

catch your left arm."

     The boy's biggest weakness had become his biggest strength (优点).

1. The boy decided to study judo though                           .

A. he was only ten years old                  

B. he would have an old teacher    

C. he had lost his left arm in a car accident        

D. he knew he was not clever

2. How did the boy feel when he was in the finals?

A. Proud.            

B. Surprised.            

C. Worried.        

D. Happy.

3. What can you infer (推断) from the passage?

A. The boy wasn't doing well at first.

B. Mr. Tanaka is a good teacher because he knows his student's strength and weakness.

C. The referee believed the boy would win.

D. The boy had predicted that he would win.

答案

1-3 CBB

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面的文字,完成后面的问题。

        学术研究的目的,最终是要影响社会,影响大众的生活。实际上,我们赖以生存和生活的许多常识,当初都是高深的学术观点。抽烟有害,如今尽人皆知,当初却不过是实验室里的结论; * * 的意识和观念,在中国也日渐普及,起先却仅仅是象牙塔里的呼声。学术的通俗化,其实一直以各种方式在进行着。过去的学者,是很注重这方面的工作的,他们往往一方面从事很专业很艰深的研究,一方面又致力于将自己专业艰深的成果尽可能向社会普及。这种普及性的著作,也能成为经典。费孝通、萨孟武,都是在学术上颇有造诣的学者,他们都另有多种专业性很强的学术著作行世;至于他们的《乡土中国》《水浒传与中国社会》这样的著作,则是在非专业的报刊上发表文章的结集,都是民国时期的“通俗经典”。

        以这种眼光来看今日学术与大众的“零距离接触”,称之为学术娱乐化或许更合适。将学术娱乐化的目的,无非是名与利,迎合和讨好大众,就是他们的基本策略。大众最想听什么,听了什么最开心,他们就说什么。而将学术通俗化绝不这样。不妨以萨孟武的《水浒传与中国社会》为例。在这本通俗性的学术著作中,萨孟武对梁山泊集团予以坚块的批判和否定。他强调,以宋江为首的粱山泊造反集团,不过是一个“流氓集团”。他从多方面分析了这种“流氓集团”与中国社会的关系,指出这种“流氓集团”在中国历史上屡屡起着极其恶劣的作用。这样一种对“梁山好汉”的评说,显然与大众心目中原有的情感观念相冲突,而萨孟武的目的,就是要摧毁改变大众长期以来对“粱山好汉”的仰慕崇拜,就是想清扫中国社会长期存在的“水浒气”。如果让今天的那些热衷于将学术娱乐化的“学者”来讲《水浒传》,他们绝不会这样讲。他们一定会极力歌颂“粱山好汉”的“义”与“勇”,一定不敢对他们的滥杀无辜、打家劫舍有半句微词。为了最大限度地获取名与利,他们就必须最大限度地迎合社会上的“水浒气”。为了讨得大众更多的喜爱,也不妨顺便称林冲为“帅哥”,说李逵是“猛男”。而大众呢,大众自然乐得合不拢嘴。在这合不拢嘴的过程中,大众身上原有的“水浒气”,就被进一步强化了。

文中两次列举《水浒传与中国社会》,各有什么作用?

_______________________________________________

单项选择题