Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization. The incident then resulted in a debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.
On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs was stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Beijing section of Jingha expressway.
Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast one in Jilin Province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.
After negotiations (协商) with the truck driver and a philanthropic (慈善) founda tion, Shangshan Foundation purchased these dogs with much money. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CSAPA) , being taken care of and waiting for adoption.
After the dog saving mission was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.
Some net users argue the dog saving mission is placing too much attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.
A microblogger "Xiaowulaitajie" said on China's twitter-like website, weibo. com, "Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media attention. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people. "
Another microblogger, Liluping, said "We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief. "
Some applaud volunteers' actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.
Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics. They argue that such act nevertheless embodies social progress.
A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not go against taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
I think people and animals are created equal. Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
小题1:. According to the passage, we know the article probably comes from________ .
A．a science fiction
B．a TV programme
C．the Internet
D．a magazine小题2:. Which one has the similar meaning to the underlined word “embodies”?
A．express.
B．share.
C．emphasize.
D．prevent.小题3:. Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?
A．Some net users'.
B．Liluping's.
C． Broken bridge 's.
D． Xiaowulaitajie's.小题4:. What does the passage mainly talk about?
A．Why some people disagree to save the 500 dogs.
B．How the volunteers saved the 500 dogs to be killed.
C．These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.
D．Different Chinese net users have different opinions on the mission.
小题1:C
小题2:A
小题3:C
小题4:D
题目分析：这篇文章主要讲了网民们针对是否要投大量资金救助待宰杀的狗狗而展开的争论。
小题1:细节题：根据The incident then resulted in a debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.可知拯救狗狗的话题辩论是在网上展开的. 故选C。
小题2:猜词题：根据Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics. They argue that such act nevertheless embodies social progress.可知有些网民认为这种行为没有表示社会进步，故选B。
小题3:推断题：根据A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not go against taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
和 I think people and animals are created equal. Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
可知作者与broken bridge的观点一致，故选D。
小题4:主旨题：根据The incident then resulted in a debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs..可知本文是不同的中国网民救助狗狗的不同观点，故选B。