问题 填空题



The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which (36) they would come under, based on their (37) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (38) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (39) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different ELI nationalities.
The (40) of member states are said to be (41) the idea and responded positively to a (42) which followed the (43) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15% of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (44) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (45) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, Malta does not allow divorce. The proposal would mean that although Maltese nationals could not divorce in Malta, a couple of different EU nationality (46) in Malta could apply to the Maltese court for a divorce under their country’s laws. Similarly in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (47) a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (48) quickly. The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "reland is not in favor of allowing (49) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse ... such abuse would be likely to (50) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (51) but could (52) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (53) approval will be required. "It is going to lead to (54) said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (55) of EU family law. The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which (36) they would come under, based on their (37) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (38) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (39) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different ELI nationalities.
The (40) of member states are said to be (41) the idea and responded positively to a (42) which followed the (43) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15% of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (44) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (45) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, Malta does not allow divorce. The proposal would mean that although Maltese nationals could not divorce in Malta, a couple of different EU nationality (46) in Malta could apply to the Maltese court for a divorce under their country’s laws. Similarly in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (47) a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (48) quickly. The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "reland is not in favor of allowing (49) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse ... such abuse would be likely to (50) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (51) but could (52) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (53) approval will be required. "It is going to lead to (54) said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (55) of EU family law. The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.

答案

参考答案:majority

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面的文言文,完成下面问题。

  党怀英,字世杰,号竹溪。故宋太尉进十一代孙,冯翊人。父纯睦,泰安军录事参军,卒官,妻子不能归,因家焉。少颖悟,日诵千余言。与辛尚书弃疾少同舍属。师于亳州刘瞻,能诗文,时号“辛党”。金初遭乱,俱在兵间。辛一旦率数千骑南渡,显于宋;党在北方,应举不得意,遂脱略世务,放浪山水间,箪瓢屡空,晏如也。大定十年,中进士第,调莒州军事判官,累除汝阴县令、国史院编修官、应奉翰林文字、翰林待制、兼同修国史。

  怀英能属文,工篆籀,当时称为第一,学者宗之。大定二十九年,与风翔府治中郝俣充《辽史》刊修官。凡民间辽时碑铭墓志及诸家文集,或记忆辽旧事,悉上送官。怀英诗文兼擅,尤长诗。性乐山水,诗文碑记不尚虚饰,因事遣词,通达流畅,平易自然,格调冲淡。著有《竹溪集》五十卷,惜久佚。怀英工书法,世称“独步金代”,尤爱玉箸篆书。泰和四年,书“泰和重宝”,铸于钱币之上,是为“金泰和”。

  是时,章宗初即位,好尚文辞,旁求文学之士以备侍从,谓宰臣曰:“翰林阙人如之何?”张汝霖奏曰:“郝俣能属文,宦业亦佳。”上曰:“近日制诏惟党怀英最善。”

  明昌元年,怀英再迁国予祭酒。二年,迁侍讲学士。明年,议开边防濠堑,怀英等十六人请罢其役,诏从之。迁翰林学士,摄中书侍郎。时增修曲阜宣圣庙,教令: “党怀英撰碑文,朕将亲行释奠之礼。”承安二年乞致仕,改泰宁军节度使,为政宽简不严,而人自服化明年,召为翰林学士承旨。久之,致仕。大安三年九月终,年七十八,谥文献,葬于奉符西旺村。赵秉文作墓志云:“公之文似欧阳公,不为尖新奇险之语;诗似陶谢,奄有魏晋;篆籀入神,李阳冰之后,一人而已。古人各一艺,公独兼之,可谓全矣。”(选自《金史·党怀英传》,有增删)

1.对下列句子中加粗词语的解释,不正确的一项是(     )

A.与辛尚书弃疾少同属——舍:学舍

B.著有《竹溪集》三十卷,惜久——佚:散失

C.翰林人如之何——阙:削减

D.迁翰林学士,中书侍郎——摄:代理,辅助

2.下列句子分别编为四组,能表现党怀英“古人各一艺,公独兼之,可谓全矣”的一组是(     )

①师于毫州刘瞻,能诗文,时号“辛党”

②与风翔府治中郝俣充《辽史》刊修官

③怀英诗文兼擅,尤长诗

④怀英工书法,世称“独步金代”,尤爱玉箸篆书

⑤旁求文学之士以备侍从

⑥为政宽简不严,而人自服化

A.①②③④

B.①②⑤⑥

C.①③④⑤

D.②③④⑥

3.下列对原文有关内容的分析和概括,不正确的一项是(     )

A.党怀英祖籍冯翊,因其父卒于泰安军录事参军而在泰安安家。少时聪颖,悟性极高,后师从毫州刘瞻,诗文方面在当时与辛弃疾齐名。

B.党怀英担任《辽史》刊修官时,民间收藏的辽代碑铭墓志以及各家的文集及记述辽代史事的文字,全部被送交到官府。

C.金章宗喜好和崇尚文辞,他认为起草诏书文字,党怀英最优秀,增修曲阜宣圣庙时,敕令党怀英撰写碑文。

D.党怀英深受皇帝器重,屡得迁职,他文才出众,在许多方面都“独步金代”;担任泰宁军节度使期间,治政有方,人自服化。

4.把文中画线的句子翻译成现代汉语。

(1)遂脱略世务,放浪山水间,箪瓢屡空,晏如也。

 __________________________________________________________

(2)承安二年乞致仕,改泰宁军节度使,为政宽简不严,而人自服化。

 __________________________________________________________

单项选择题 A1/A2型题