问题 填空题



The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which (36) they would come under, based on their (37) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (38) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (39) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different ELI nationalities.
The (40) of member states are said to be (41) the idea and responded positively to a (42) which followed the (43) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15% of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (44) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (45) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, Malta does not allow divorce. The proposal would mean that although Maltese nationals could not divorce in Malta, a couple of different EU nationality (46) in Malta could apply to the Maltese court for a divorce under their country’s laws. Similarly in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (47) a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (48) quickly. The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "reland is not in favor of allowing (49) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse ... such abuse would be likely to (50) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (51) but could (52) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (53) approval will be required. "It is going to lead to (54) said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (55) of EU family law. The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which (36) they would come under, based on their (37) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (38) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (39) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different ELI nationalities.
The (40) of member states are said to be (41) the idea and responded positively to a (42) which followed the (43) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15% of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (44) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (45) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, Malta does not allow divorce. The proposal would mean that although Maltese nationals could not divorce in Malta, a couple of different EU nationality (46) in Malta could apply to the Maltese court for a divorce under their country’s laws. Similarly in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (47) a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (48) quickly. The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "reland is not in favor of allowing (49) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse ... such abuse would be likely to (50) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (51) but could (52) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (53) approval will be required. "It is going to lead to (54) said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (55) of EU family law. The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.

答案

参考答案:nationalities

单项选择题

阅读下面短文,回答文后问题。
随着科技水平的提高和人们对物质世界更深层次的认识,医用生物材料作为材料大家族中与人们的关系最直接、最密切的一个分支,也得到了迅猛的发展。人们现在可以制造出各种生物医学材料来修复和替代人体器官,提高人们的生活质量,延长人们的生存空间。
介入医学是一门融医学影像学和临床治疗学为一体的新兴边缘科学,涉及人体消化、呼吸、心血管、神经、泌尿、骨骼等多个系统疾病的诊断和治疗。生物医学材料的研究和发展对介入医学的普及和发展起着举足轻重的作用。尤其是为一些不治之症或难治之症,如癌症、心血管疾病等,开拓了新的治疗途径,而且简便、安全、有效、并发症少。在介入疗法中,插入身体的导丝、导管壳、导管、血管支架,球囊导管,以及人体内各腔道支架,都是由医用生物材料制成的。
利用医用生物材料制成的支架,不仅可以扩张血管,还可以为患食道肿瘤的病人服务。把这些支架放入患处,可使患者恢复进食和排泄,减轻患者的病痛,提高生存质量。又如治疗血管肿瘤,随着肿瘤的增大,会压迫血管,造成供血不足,甚至威胁生命。利用导管把为肿瘤提供营养的血管堵住,肿瘤就会由于得不到营养而死亡、脱落。
系统性红斑狼疮,是一种自身免疫性疾病。目前的研究表明,患者自身免疫系统发生紊乱,产生过多的抗DNA抗体及抗体附属物,从而损害组织器官。生物医学材料的发展和基因工程在医学上的应用,为治疗这种疾病提供了新的思路。人们制造了一种高分子材料,经碳化后形成微小的碳颗粒,通过生物提取技术,从小牛胰腺中提取DNA进行分离纯化,制成具有生物活性的DNA免疫吸附剂,然后组装成DNA免疫吸附剂的血液净化装置。
在实际医疗过程中,使患者的血液作体外循环,在通过DNA免疫吸附装置时,血液中的抗DNA抗体就会被吸附剂所吸附,从而达到治疗的效果。从理论上讲,如果我们能够找到合适的DNA,就可以通过血液换流的方法治疗任何免疫系统疾病,
(选自王渝生主编的《改变人类的科学活动》,上海科学技术文献出版社,2004)

下列各项中,不符合本文关于介入医学描述的是:

A.介入医学为不治之症开辟了新的治疗途径

B.介入医学与医用生物材料本身的研究和发展无关

C.介入医学提供血管和各腔道的支架,植入患者体内

D.介入医学操作简便且并发症少

单项选择题 A1型题